Show more

EU: Let’s backdoor encryption – by 2026, or even sooner. Since it's impossible to backdoor encryption in a way that can’t be potentially exploited by others, it seems a very odd move theregister.com/2025/04/03/eu_

@thomasfricke @signalapp @OpenTechFund @TheAtlantic Lucky OTF is popular with the US Congress because it is quite effective, a majority of both Democrats and Republicans support OTF. After the first attempt to shut down OTF in the first Trump administration, Congress changed the law to require the money to fund and to require security audits, as well as requiring that OTF specifically has money dedicated to it.

@thomasfricke @signalapp @OpenTechFund @TheAtlantic this whole case is a clear example for how the US Federal Gov works. Before , the money went to a proprietary software firm , which also refused to do security audits. That firm has been paying to lobby for them to get the money away from OTF. axios.com/2020/06/23/falun-gon

@thomasfricke @signalapp @OpenTechFund @TheAtlantic The good news is that the administration had such a weak case, they just rescinded the grant termination once it came to court. The court also kept the case open, despite the Trump admin arguing it was moot, until they actually paid the money they were owed. Now OTF has been paid:

storage.courtlistener.com/reca

China built hundreds of #AI #datacenter s to catch the AI boom. Now many stand unused.
The country poured billions into AI infrastructure, but the data center gold rush is unraveling as speculative investments collide with weak demand and DeepSeek shifts AI trends.

technologyreview.com/2025/03/2

Time flies when you're busy building apps, but not all #FDroid contributors need to wrangle Python, escape YAML or restart Gitlab pipelines.

If you want to have a saying in the betterment of F-Droid, from the inside, you are welcomed to nominate yourself or somebody else you find worthy for a Board of Directors seat.

You have time until April 14th, so head to: f-droid.org/2025/03/30/board-o

funds this think tank to put out policy papers saying will break their lovely scare screens, making us all less safe and "it require[s] Google to allow developers to insert links inside their Play Store apps".

ecipe.org/publications/eu-dma-

As I've always said in relation to the , let @fdroidorg compete on trustworthiness. I'd love to see this think thank include analysis malware rates of with and compare that to

@1br0wn Yes indeed, it would be great to have a community controlled version of . The hard part is that Google still is the largest contributor to Android by a large margin. The ROM projects have started to work together, but not enough to get community control. The team has put quite a bit of effort into trying to get this idea going. The key would be to get companies to switch to a community-controlled version, e.g. Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Oppo, etc.

@danslerush I agree, it is definitely a not good. My guess is that Google is feeling the heat from the and other monopoly-busting actions around the world. So they are scrambling for ways to keep control of those massive monopoly profit margins. If they cared about streamlining development, they would go fully open. That's well established and proven as a way to efficiently develop large software projects, e.g. Linux, Chromium, Firefox, GNU/Linux distros, etc.

"Exclusive: Google will develop the Android OS fully in private..."

Looking again at androidauthority.com/google-an I really think that was a PR piece, e.g. 's PR firm put together the story for Authority. Its got all the markings, the "Exclusive" part, the uncritical eye "Google is simply consolidating its development efforts into a single branch", minimizing harm to custom ROMs, "custom ROMs will largely also see little change" etc

@michaelharley I'm feeling quite good about it, I've been using as my main app store for years now. But of course, I'm biased ;-)

@johns nice! Is this feature documented anywhere? I couldn't find it.

GitHub has gone - long live Forgejo (@forgejo).

Fully migrated out of Microsoft’s walled garden after they blocked us:

- 54k commits
- 9.5k issues
- 4.3k pull requests
- 100k comments

Everything moved. Nothing left behind.

git.omaps.dev/organicmaps/orga

Nobody can lose, leak, lease, loan or liquidate your data if they don't have it. That's why we work hard to remove metadata from our systems, so your personal data is not even there to be gathered, let alone mishandled.

social.librem.one/@guardianpro

It is important to understand that the personal data you give to a company becomes their "property". Even if a company that currently runs a service keeps the data private, it can be put up for sale. The new owners are then free to operate differently, especially when there is no GDPR like in the US.

science.slashdot.org/story/25/

v35.0.2 is now in trixie. The v3.1 signer rotation stuff needs testing. Please try it out!

Getting apksigner from Debian has two key advantages over the Google binaries:

* They are reproducibly built.
* They have an actual free software license.

I'm starting to think I must be a bot. I'm no longer human. I see so many prompts on the internet asking me if I'm human, or triggering "anti-bot" protections.

@Bubu A very nice write up, I like the approach. I think the key is that he simply asked them for support. Lots of FOSS devs don't want to ask, I know that from myself. Asking for donations, or even nagging, is well know to work. Like Wikipedia. I wonder if it would be possible to eliminate the friction to donating so much that FOSS devs could make a living without having to learn how to run fundraising campaigns? Maybe it just isn't possible.

Show more
image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml