Show more

I've long thought that it was messed up that engineers chose to portray AI servants as women, and that it reinforced bad stereotypes and behaviors. Now some studies have come out that reinforce this: bbc.com/news/technology-483491

I've been critical of elastic in the past for making basic security like TLS part of their paid Enterprise software. I'm happy to see them open up these security features now: elastic.co/blog/security-for-e

"Recognizing that something needs to be done is easy. Looking to AI to help do that thing is also easy. Actually doing content moderation well is very, very difficult, and you should be suspicious of any claim to the contrary." eff.org/deeplinks/2019/04/cont

The practice of content moderation is fundamentally broken, and the integration of AI isn't going to fix it. It's time to rethink the system entirely—and we've got ideas. eff.org/deeplinks/2019/04/cont

@bane Not sure, any in particular you need? I'm old school and use ASCII... :)

I was interviewed by Fast Company about @purism hardware kill switches in this piece on the current trend to put them in home automation devices to address everyone's unease with always-on cameras and mics in their bedroom.
fastcompany.com/90349731/the-h

Free startup idea: registering "dibs" on the blockchain. Remember me when you're rich.

I see some people pressuring tech companies to build a machine that blocks entire groups from Internet Society. They must be bigger optimists than I am, all I can think of is how such a machine will be abused.

In Idaho, a judge has ruled that law enforcement cannot compel a person to unlock their phone with a fingerprint because it would violate their 5th Amendment rights, following a similar ruling in California earlier this year.
forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewste

If I could turn back time,
if I could find a way,
I'd get back to the shell before vim ran, and you'd say:

If I could reach Esc,
I'd change my mode for you,
and you'd insert text, remove text like you used to do.

Tech companies and online platforms have other ways to address the rapid spread of disinformation, including addressing the algorithmic “megaphone” at the heart of the problem, and giving users control over their own feeds. eff.org/deeplinks/2019/05/cens

@geek Not sure, may need to contact support for that one.

@geek Yes, some of these things, eventually, may be configurable. We are starting by erring on the side of safety and "opt in", and as we can figure out ways to achieve that while allowing some of those options down the road, you might see some of that.

@geek The thought is that it makes it clear that social media posts are public and protects against accidental disclosure of things (through misconfiguration or other mistakes) that you thought were private (but are only pseudo-private without encryption) both from outsiders and also from us or anyone who would request your data.

Today we've updated the Librem One website with two important documents:

A short guide to staying safe online no matter what online service you are using. Like our policy document we've kept it short and to the point, with links to more detailed, independent resources if you'd like to learn more.

librem.one/stay-safe/

As well as a code of conduct that makes it clear we will respond to reports of harassment, for example on Librem Social, our opt-in social network.

librem.one/conduct/

This last week all Firefox addons were accidentally disabled due to issues in Mozilla certs. Many security measures out there require full, unrevokable trust in the vendor for them to work and this is a great example of the risks with that approach. Imagine if that ever happened with SecureBoot...

Show more
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml