Show more

Unlike Google, F-Droid does not force developers to publicize their name or address information.

We understand that people have many reasons to develop under another name than their legal one and to keep their personal information private. And that what matters is the trust between user and developer, not private details of their lives.

For more information on how we designed F-Droid to protect your privacy, see f-droid.org/2022/02/28/no-user.

Attempts by airlines, airports, and government agencies to make facial recognition mandatory for air travel being challenged in both the US and the EU papersplease.org/wp/2023/08/02

So many English-language media outlets report on coups simply as an attack on democracy without actually talking about why people are supporting the coup. Too often "democracy" in post-colonial states means choosing between leaders handpicked by old colonial powers who represent those interests (Afghanistan is a clear example).

One supporter said: "There’s a small number of people profiting from the riches of Niger, Nigeriens cannot live like that."
english.elpais.com/internation

Neither nor is helping with . They are giving us an easy out that won't actually work. Even so-called energy has an environmental impact, including water use, mining, use of oil for plastics, etc. At this point, electric cars should be taxed the same as any other, except maybe cheap ones. It is absurd at this point to subsidize building environmentally damaging luxury cars like Teslas. Get more people walking, biking, taking transit

hardware.slashdot.org/story/23

@EU_Commission oh my lord can we please drop the silly "Web 3.0 / 4.0" buzzwords already? Pretty please? 🙄

They've been utterly taken over by cryptocurrency peddlers and other snakeoil salesmen. They are unnecessary even if they hadn't been taken over.

Instead, can we focus on making the web we have trustworthy, privacy-preserving, and safe? :blobcatcoffee:

Its frustrating to see how deeply cartels have infiltrated our culture, that people call making cost-free digital copies "theft" even in countries where it is fully legal to do so. It is not even "copyright infringement" if it is not against the local copyright laws. And yes, unlike laws about theft, copyright laws vary widely around the world. I've always liked "Copying Is Not Theft" has an illustration of the difference yewtu.be/watch?v=IeTybKL1pM4

I still don't get why or do not allow devs to give source when uploading apps for review. It makes review tasks much easier and more reliable, as we've seen with 's review. Would it scare the app devs too much? Are they more interested in cheap "window dressing" reviews than actually catching things? It is hard not to see bias since both are getting lots of money from apps they are policing.
For example
arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/0 1/

Crazy tool idea: set up then mine the emails for gateways, which are then automatically shared out to users who have browser plugin installed which unblocks access to anything in IPFS.

Turns out that Web Environment Integrity proposal everybody is getting angry about (imo very legitimately) was effectively already shipped by Apple in Safari last year: httptoolkit.com/blog/apple-pri

That means if Chromium ships it too, we could quickly move to 90%+ of browser traffic being attested. Not good!

#Mozilla has published its position on the "Web Environment Integrity API" proposal put forward by the #Google #Chrome team.

First paragraph: "Mozilla opposes this proposal because it contradicts our principles and vision for the Web."

github.com/mozilla/standards-p

'Ada & Zangemann - A tale of software, skateboards, and raspberry ice cream' book reading

☑️ FrOSCon 2023
🗓️ 6 August
⏰ 10 h
📍HS7
💻 programm.froscon.org/2023/even

#SoftwareFreedom #FreeSoftware

"'s newest proposed web standard is... ?" -- Google is proposing yet another user-hostile feature and aims to make it an web standard called "Web Environment Integrity API". This lets websites confirm the browser has limitations on what it can do, going against . The internet standard RFC 8890 declares "The Internet Is For End Users". Google's API circumvents that.

Thanks to Ron Amadeo for his a concise, cutting analysis:
arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/0

#Google’s nightmare “Web Integrity API” wants a #DRM gatekeeper for the web | #ArsTechnica

Oh, great! Seems we have a 180° turn, and we are now doing the #NetNeutrality 2.0 discussion. Honestly, I always wonder how they think they could possibly implement something like this?

Do they think no one in the tech world will notice and not resist something like this? Do they think this would just result in a 100% conversion rate and every single person would uinstall #Firefox and #Chrome would be the #Netscape of 2023?

Now I understand why they removed the dislike button from #Youtube before they pitched this idea. This is such a #Zuckerberg idea. And the worst part is, he'll probably slap his sticker on this and we'll have this argument again in 6 month's where he'll want to limit the internet to people having VR headsets and being in the #metaverse.

arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/0

#infosec #webintegrity #security

Looks like the latest release of , v1.17.0, does not get flagged by , at least in the 14 emulator. I heard some reports that v1.16.4 also isn't flagged. I don't really know why its flagging F-Droid then. v1.16.4 has an unchanged , but v1.17.0 has it bumped to 28. I have found no way to get info on why they are flagging the app, just this silly "unsafe" warning screen. Is F-Droid being flagged by Google Play Protect on your devices? Please let me know.

Show thread

What to do about the lack of #DataSkills?

In the iTalks series organised by our iLab, 🔟 experts on #DataLiteracy discussed it with almost 7⃣0⃣0⃣ participants from public sector, academia, and civil society! 👩‍💻

Missed it? Check the slides & recordings 👉 europa.eu/!x98WfB

On the other hand, includes "Group Integrity", which means that all members in a group see the same state. This means all members see the same list of members, same message transcript, same message order, etc. Protocol does not guarantee Group Integrity. I think this is an important property, but I wonder how much this was actually abused in the real world with other protocols? 3/

Show thread
Show more
image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml