I wonder if the way the and are leading the has something to do with too much reliance on "yes men" setup. There is all the news about being essential to their planning. It seems they are moving tactically fast, killing key leaders, bombing so many things. But it looks strategically stupid. They are surprised that is closed. states' bubble of perceived safety has popped, etc.

theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/

The military industrial complex is not even being intelligent about this war in . They are stuck in a bubble thinking that their overwhelming air power can do anything. This war has been in the making for years, so they had plenty of time to think about it.

"Iran has demonstrated it can escalate the costs of the war for far beyond its military capabilities to meaningfully counter the US-Israeli attack directly.

theguardian.com/world/2026/mar

@liaizon @scan Persona probably makes it really easy to integrate. OpenCollective needs to solve a real problem. The best approach here is to help find and integrate better systems since they seem open to other options.

Putting the fundamental issues with GenAI aside for a second, I think I see a lot of parallels between self-driving cars and AI-generated programming. People are mostly okay drivers and okay programmers.

But a machine is always going to be faster and more precise in highly controlled enviroments. Except we don't live in highly controlled environments.

The political risk I see is that we start heading towards a world that's a highly controlled environment, a world built for LLMs not humans.

Show more
image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml