Show more

When we say #OpenSource, we mean business. That's why ALL Tuta apps are published on @fdroidorg

While Google & Apple monitor all push notifications, your data is safe when choosing Tuta Mail. 🔒

➡️ Learn why Tuta Mail is the only email provider app on F-Droid: tuta.com/blog/open-source-emai

#FOSS #Fdroid #Android #deGoogle

Dear tech media, could we please stop using GrapheneOS as the judge on what's secure? I respect very much what GrapheneOS has built, but their stance that free software is not important to security is very short sighted. They literally are willing to call binary blobs secure because someone told them they are? They have no other standard to go on, since they can't inspect them.

theregister.com/2025/10/15/fsf

'The people who make our lives more difficult arrive in private jets, not dinghies.'

@shaadra @forgejo While true that GitLab has proprietary features, the FOSS version is complete and widely used. What I'm talking about is more than just source code. GitLab operates as a company quite openly on gitlab.com and their employee handbook handbook.gitlab.com/ is public and open to all to submit merge requests. Or how Debian/F-Droid dev discussions happen on public forums that anyone can join. FOSDEM is another great example, anyone can just show up and take part in all of it

@matthew_d_green A lot of that discussion is currently happening in scope of the European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDIW) framework. Most people in these discussions are acutely aware of the far-reaching effects of all the associated nuances, with many of them remaining hard to predict. So we are pushing hard for the most privacy-preserving architecture we can come up with.

I'd love to hear your thoughts, e.g. on pseudonyms and the properties they should have: arxiv.org/abs/2510.05419v1

@me @fsf @fsfe This is important work, and a key piece of the puzzle for freeing our mobile devices. The other key is making it a right to unlock the bootloader and replace the operating system on devices that we own. Without that, all those users are still stuck on Android even if a perfect alternative exists. We believe this should be the next thing that the () addresses.

https://librephone.fsf.org/

Free the last bits of "anything Android"?

My positive thought about this is that #PostmarketOS and #MobileLinux in general will profit from any public knowledge about hardware it could run on.

If I understood correctly the money for doing the work on the #Android blobs is donated by John Gilmore. His Money, his decision where to put it. And there is a positive effect, but there is also a negative one:

Android is based on ideas by #Google. To free it we'd need to fork it and adopt it to different ideals and goals. Android is designed to maximize the profit of Google.

It is not designed with the users well-being and interests as the primary goal.

Just replacing blobs in Android keeps the ecosystem the same, promotes Google and their goals and leaves the control over design decisions for Android in Googles hands.

Once a device is freed by hard work of a few engineers it will be old, it will be uninteresting for people looking at Android and the latest shiny hardware running it.

But still - Mobile Linux will make good use of those devices as free OSes in general do when it comes to hardware left behind by commercial OSes.

@fsf@hostux.social @fsfe@media.fsfe.org

@jones It is true that many governments and corporations are not fully compliant with the law. It is not a myth, it is legally how they are supposed to operate in most of the world. Even the Russian and Chinese governments right now have forms of transparency. And anywhere I've looked, public corporations are required to publish more information about their operations than private ones.

Having fun with #googleplay support. I'd like them to remove my developer profile so that I don't get policy emails I don't need, but they won't because I am non-compliant! To comply I have to send them a scan of my ID (not happening) then somehow bring an ancient app into compliance with a policy it allegedly violated. The violation? Having the same content as another app. That other app is v2.0 of the same thing; some users complained about the changes so I left v1.0 around for them. ...

When building software, I believe it is important to work in public. Software can give small groups of developers immense power over lots of people. Like how governments work in public and corporations have to be more public than private company, developers should be transparent not only with their source code, but also the discussions and processes while building it. This can be hard to get used to, but not bad once used to it. Great examples of this are and IMHO

@Chapz anyone can just legally make an MP3 file. Or if you have CDs, it is legal to make MP3 copies for personal use. Or if you purchased MP3s from the artist, or from iTunes, Bandcamp, etc.

#BrusselsAirport:

Step 1: Remove all public #water fountains.
Step 2: Redesign #bathrooms with water taps so low people cannot drink from them.
Step 3: Sell bottled water for 5€ per bottle.

#capitalism #ripoff

As much as most people do not like how services like and Music abuse both listeners and artist, they use them because they are easy and friction-free. For alternatives to gain anything but a tiny following, the software behind them also must be easy. That requires a chunk of work, but it is achievable by a small team. There are already options: and more

theguardian.com/technology/202

@rene_mobile very interesting, when do you think there will be usable implementations to try?

@eighthave
That's pretty much what (rate limiting) pseudonyms can do as well, with perfect unlinkability if we get ZKP presentations into the implementation: arxiv.org/abs/2510.05419

"As the sole gateway for app distribution on iOS devices, Apple’s App Store is a key pillar of its market power" sounds eerie familiar to #FDroid.

Can somebody discover why and tell us? 🤷

Here's the link to the full text: amnesty.org/latest/news/2025/0

Thanks for any clues!

@tuxicoman that's not how copyright law works. Currently everything is copyrighted once its created, that includes emails. Just because someone forwards someone else email does not mean that they can grant a license for a text that someone else created.

@tuxicoman No, I'm not proposing DMA, just following copyright law and not caving into the AI companies or even changing the laws for them.

Show more
image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml