Bryan Lunduke @lunduke@librem.one

@steven@todon.nl @rune @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz

What. Did... did you read the thing I just posted? Your response doesn't seem like a response to what I wrote.

You've also attacked me a great deal (based on just... totally made up stuff).

I... I really think there must be a basic, simple misunderstanding somewhere in here.

@emsenn

Huh. Okay then.

You want me to have said a thing.

I did not say the thing.

I believe that is the end of that until either

a) You decide that I did not say a thing or
b) I retroactively say the thing.

Good day, sir.

@steven@todon.nl @rune @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz

You said:
"Purism deliberately designed Librem Social to be a safe space for Nazis to plan attacks, and there is a paper trail of all of this"

I said:
"There *definitely* is not a paper trail proving that. Because it's clearly not true."

I think... do we possibly have a language issue here? Or do we have a grammar problem that is making this needlessly difficult?

@emsenn

Cool. Cool.

So. To sum up:

You found someone semi-sorta-pretendy-famous-lite on the Internet. You don't like that person. So you tell that person why you don't like them?

@steven@todon.nl @rune @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz When did I deny that?

@emsenn

Hm. I don't know you. I don't even know who you are. But I can say that you were not kind towards me.

You say that you have reasons to "unfollow" me. That is totally fine. But your reasons are false. You may still unfollow me, but to repeat untruths is not kind.

@steven@todon.nl @rune @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz

?

Please provide links to where I said specifically what you say. I'd gladly review that and see.

@shit @purism @rune @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz @paulfree14 @steven@todon.nl Whoah now. Be cool. Everyone, even if you disagree with them, is a person.

@paulfree14 @ThisIsLeeloo @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz @purism How does that make me a liar? Government agencies called Antifa a terrorist organization. Not me. I reported on the potential problems relating to a corporation donating to another organization which provides support to Antifa. Specifically around what problems that could raise for the donating company. Are you just unhappy with the title wording?

@steven@todon.nl @rune @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz Again... I didn't say any of that. You can be mad at me. That's ok. But I didn't say what you say I said.

@emsenn I didn't do or say that. You may block me, for any reason you like. But I still didn't say that.

@ThisIsLeeloo @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz @paulfree14 @purism That's just it. I didn't say that. You appear to be angry at me for something I didn't actually say.

@karabiner @purism @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz @paulfree14 @steven@todon.nl

Accurate headline that, due to the nature of such things, cannot contain enough words to fully encapsulate the nuances of the issue being fully discussed within the body of the piece -- and which, quite correctly, evokes an opinion among those reading it who have an understanding of the topic.

@paulfree14 @steven@todon.nl @purism @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz

Correct. Maybe you just need to re-read the source? Are you upset because the headline / title does not contain all the nuance of the video itself?

@rune @steven@todon.nl @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz

Shrug. We forked Mastodon. Talk about it a bunch -- including in multiple blog posts. Not exactly a secret... it's a good thing! :)

@steven@todon.nl @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz

Neither of those statements were made by me.

Please provide exact quotes and a direct link to where you obtained those quotes.

Having differing ideas to me is ok (even good!). Having different opinions about the same statement is also totally ok. But you are saying I said things that I know for a fact I never said.

That borders into Libelous territory.

@steven@todon.nl @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz

I mean, I suppose I could apologize... but I'd be apologizing for saying something... that I never actually said. So it would be fairly hollow... no?

@steven@todon.nl @purism @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz

You are saying that I said things... that I simply did not say.

It's difficult to defend -- or apologize for -- words... when I did not say those words.

I respect your passion on the various topics -- and I in no way want to belittle those ideas or you personally. But I simply did not say the things you say I did.

Perhaps your fight is elsewhere, my friend?

@steven@todon.nl @paulfree14 @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz @purism

I'm not saying that. Not in the slightest.

I was covering how government officials consider a specific organization. Had zero to do with my own viewpoints.

And... can you point to where Purism does what you say?

@steven@todon.nl @gabriele@social.lucci.xyz @paulfree14 @purism

Huh? I acknowledged... what? HUH? I think you might be having an argument with someone else that is not me.

Also...

There *definitely* is not a paper trail proving that. Because it's clearly not true.

Read here:
https://librem.one/stay-safe/

and here:
https://librem.one/conduct/