@hehemrin I think the requirement of privacy is incompatible with iOS. Apple will track you anyway.
Also, FOSS becomes less meaningful because with iOS you cannot really know what you install, you cannot build and install from source and you cannot know if Apple have modified the app you install. The program you actually install may not correspond to the public source code, you will never know.
You need to move from iOS to a free (as in freedom) operating system! Then install a FOSS pod app 🙂
@justincroser@social.linux.pizza What kind of server, what will it be used for?
Whatever you answer to that, I will probably recommend #debian anyway 🙂
@jesperstromback verkligen, men hur kunde de få så många röster att de klarade spärren?
Vilka är de väljarna, hur tänker de? Någon som bryr sig om liberalism kan väl knappast rösta på partiet. Kanske 2% som röstar L av gammal vana utan att tänka, plus 2% stödröster från M?
@fridahylander Aha, spännande!
Jag tolkar det som att ni har bevisat att yoga fungerar 🙂
@fridahylander Bra jobbat!
Vad handlade det om?
@ubuntuxp Congrats! Please share how it goes when you start using it.
Så himla bra skrivet om integritet och frihet av @mattiasaxell och @eliasr från @dfri om debatten om #bankid
"Men det viktiga frihetsperspektivet saknas. Kinberg Batra tar inte upp frågan om digitala rättigheter. I dag är människors möjlighet att kommunicera utan att bli spårade och avlyssnade kraftigt inskränkt."
”Diskussionen om e-legitimation saknar frihetsperspektivet” - DN.SE
https://www.dn.se/debatt/diskussionen-om-e-legitimation-saknar-frihetsperspektivet/
DFRI-replik om e-legitimation på DN Debatt idag:
”Diskussionen om e-legitimation saknar frihetsperspektivet”
https://www.dn.se/debatt/diskussionen-om-e-legitimation-saknar-frihetsperspektivet/
@drbjork not corrected, you mean now corrected?
... but of course I agree that blocking because of admins having a personal tiff is not how the tech was intended to work.
@terryenglish I'm sorry to have misunderstood you.
How I came to that, was from your statement that "federation is not a good moderation tool". Because how moderation happens is very important, my thinking was that you preferred systems where moderation worked differently.
Anyway, I see now that it was a misunderstanding.
Regarding letting technology work as intended, I think many folks would see one instance blocking another instance as a feature they want the tech to allow.
The road to Loch Maree.
A view everyone takes ,but hard to resist.
.
#Scotland #Mountains #Loch #Highlands #Highlander #Outlander #Landscape
@martijnbraam Missing this option that would have applied for me:
"I know pmos, have tried it and might try again, but I'm not using it right now"
I think it's a great project, thanks for working on it!
@terryenglish is your point that you prefer centralized system where a single central authority decides everything?
In my view, federation seems better. If a situation like you describe happens, the thing to do is either to influence the admin to change policy about blocking the other one, or else move to a different instance that works better for you. You have options, in contrast to the centralized case where you can't do anything if someone get blocked.
@hehemrin #DFRI har ett projekt om detta: https://www.dfri.se/projekt/e-legitimation/
I noticed this is working now, it works to stop the alarm without unlocking. Thanks! 👍
It will be much appreciated by certain of my family members who have been complaining that it always took so long for me to turn off the alarm in the morning. 😄
Human being. Programmer, sailor, researcher, teacher, student, parent, child, etc. Free/libre and open-source software (FOSS/FLOSS) enthusiast. Likes human rights, including digital rights such as privacy of communication. Casual hacker. On Mastodon since about 2020. Lives in Stockholm. He/him. No DMs.