DanielTux @danielst@librem.one

@purism To plausibly convey that librem.one does not lead to lock-in, you need to show (in addition to open standards) that leaving is non-painful, for example by pointing out ways to download/move data, and also the ability to downgrade back to a free account without losing everything.

Also, it is a bit insensitive to only have PureOS as a link, not the mentioned projects. Sends the wrong message.

@mathieu @purism I like that. They say it's for readability, but such examples also tend to attract useless discussions.
I still wish @lunduke would lobby for a TLDR CoC "Be excellent to each other" :)

@lunduke by the way, I always knew you belong to @purism

You might not remember, but late 2017 you quoted me in a show on "Linux things that make us smile", with "The prospect of holding a ... #FLOSS phone in my hands in 2019, thanks to Purism".

I tweeted that, specifically bc. I felt you didn't give it enough attention, silently hoping they'd sponsor the show one day.
Silently? Well, maybe I nudged staffers, too... ;)

Hope you'll level up PR
Communic. is basically my only criticism w Purism

So, Mr. @lunduke Sir, here I am.
As I said, I'll follow you everywhere 😉