@agx thanks! I do have spare devices, don't worry about that 😉
@carlton this helps I think: look at the center piece on each side, that defines the color of that side since you cannot move the center piece.
Then try to get one side complete, taking care to not only get the right color on that side but also on the adjacent side. E.g. if you try to get a complete white side, then there is a piece that is white and green, then you know exactly where that piece should be because you know which side is the green side.
@JohanAlfredeen tack! paprikan är lite som en vindruva då... kanske funkar som tapas om du marinerar den med massa vitlök? 🙂
@JohanAlfredeen det här går ju inte, jag vet inte hur stor Milou är.
@annaardin särskilt obehagligt med den där parentesen. Ju yngre person desto större anledning att utöva förtryck mot personen, tydligen.
@agx ok, thanks!
Is there anything mere mortals like myself can do to help making Crimson ready?
@JoWa hur var den?
Happy birthday to GNU! 🎂 The GNU Project turns 40 today and has been a champion of free and open source software in all that time.
We extend a big thank you to the GNU Project for laying the groundwork for the movement, the value of which becomes more apparent with each year. Thank you!
Quote:
"The Commission has been reluctant to detail the relationship between Thorn and Johansson’s cabinet under the EU’s freedom of information mechanism. [...] disclosure [...] would undermine the organisation’s commercial interest”."
So we cannot have democracy because that would hurt the "commercial interest" of those who want to sell their mass-surveillance technology to the EU.
#ChatControl #StopChatControl #StoppaChatControl #svpol #eupol #democracy
SO good -- the best follow the money reporting on who's behind the global attack on digital privacy yet.
TLDR: it's law enforcement x AI companies posing as NGOs w a commercial interest in selling scammy mass scanning tech. Deeply cynical, deeply shady.
@jon absolutely, go ahead. Sorry for bothering you.
> welcome *technical* and NOT
> *political/ethical* answers
So you assume it is possible to separate those?
I don't think that works, technology is politics 🙂
In your question you ask what is "better", but what is meant by "better" is very political. "Better" for whom? For society, for some kind of common good, or for a certain company's business? That's political.
Photo of #GamlaStan taken from the #Skeppsholmsbron bridge this morning. Trying to compete with @stockholmpixels
#stockholm #stockholmbypixels #cityphotography #ShotOnLibrem5
@Mer__edith @franzmueller @nateb
I mean, the EU is huge and there must normally be a procedure where experts in the field will review any proposal before it is presented. But in this case, experts have been ignored. How is that possible? All experts say it is madness.
The process of how the proposal was created is deeply flawed. That should be investigated, and it could be done by a journalist who does not need deep technical knowledge, it's a problem at another level, about how the EU works.
Human being. Programmer, sailor, researcher, teacher, student, parent, child, etc. Free/libre and open-source software (FOSS/FLOSS) enthusiast. Likes human rights, including digital rights such as privacy of communication. Casual hacker. On Mastodon since about 2020. Lives in Stockholm. He/him. No DMs.