@quincy @programming_discussions
Some huge companies used to be so upset about harmless filesharing, torrents and such things, but now we see that they love plagiarism when they are the ones to benefit from it.
They are taking the work of others, throwing it into a copying/mixing machine and presenting the result as their own. What they are doing is just as despicable as more traditional plagiarism, they are just doing it in a more advanced way and calling it "intelligence". Gah.
> gör oss beroende av ett antal
> leverantörer av avancerad teknologi
Det där är det viktigaste tror jag: utvecklingen verkar gå mot att ännu mer makt och kontroll centraliseras till ett fåtal gigantiska aktörer, de får ännu mer makt och de kommar att använda den till att stärka sin egen position ytterligare. Människor blir alltmer som boskap som manipuleras för jättarnas syften.
Obs att "Open"-AI inte alls är öppet, inte det minsta. Det borde bojkottas redan pga lögnen i namnet.
These flags were hoisted today close to where I live in #Bergshamra, #Solna, #Sweden, I think the occasion today is to celebrate somebody's birthday. All flags blue and yellow, but the one in the middle has a different pattern.
@Mayobrot make spinach soup! Yummy
Please stop your plans on mass surveillance in the EU, as in the "chat control" proposal. The right to private communication should be protected, it is a fundamental right which is necessary to preserve in a democratic society.
If you are interested in protecting children, then please protect our children from a dystopian future where everyone's communication is monitored by the state. What you are proposing is very dangerous.
https://edri.org/our-work/chat-control-10-principles-to-defend-children-in-the-digital-age/
https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/2/2/stop-the-proposal-on-mass-surveillance-of-the-eu/
@EU_Commission I followed to see if you would come to your senses and take away the #ChatControl proposal.
"OpenAI does not disclose what datasets it uses to train the models backing its popular chatbot, ChatGPT"
It's quite disturbing that they get away with having the word "open" in the name "OpenAI". As I understand it, some of their source code is also closed. Pretty much everything is closed, but let's go ahead and call it "open" because that sounds better? WTF
@carl Bra!
Kom ihåg att också värna möjligheten för människor att faktiskt välja något annat istället för jättarna.
Jag är orolig över den väldigt spridda bilden att vi bara måste acceptera att alla människor använder Google/Facebook/osv och att allt vi kan göra är att försöka reglera jättarna.
Ännu viktigare än att reglera jättarna är att slå vakt om möjligheten att faktiskt vara fri från dem.
@Mojeek thank you!
Heh "plausible bullshit", that was funny 🙂
One idea for videos is to throw up a PeerTube instance, I tried that myself and found it was fairly easy.
@RenewedRebecca yes I agree
@festal if someone claims there is no such problem, then I would like to tell them: "okay but then you don't need to bother with new training data anymore, just skip that and make a loop feeding the machine its own output back as input".
I imagine it will be like an animal trying to survive by eating its own feces. After a few cycles of that, there is not much more to gain.
> While the AI depends on
> user interaction and
> open sources (as training data)
> its practice kills both.
Based on that, one would expect things to stagnate once all user interaction and open sources have been fed into it?
@Mojeek if there is a non-Google way of watching it, I'd be very interested.
@muminpappa alla de på en och samma dag?!? du skojar
Human being. Programmer, sailor, researcher, teacher, student, parent, child, etc. Free/libre and open-source software (FOSS/FLOSS) enthusiast. Likes human rights, including digital rights such as privacy of communication. Casual hacker. On Mastodon since about 2020. Lives in Stockholm. He/him. No DMs.