Show more

@abacabadabacaba I agree with EFF that using credit cards, driver's licenses, etc is problematic. That's my point, there are well known methods for exchanging authentication privately. That industry has the money to develop software they need.

That industry also has a long and wide track record of all sorts of abuse and exploitation. Instead of earnestly engaging with the real harms, they are just fighting this to protect their profits. EFF should know better to be joining that effort.

Wow is shameless in their attacks on the ! Yes, the affects them in ways they don't like, that's why we have the it! Then they do all this crap instead of earnestly engaging with the democratic process. And now they are lobbying to have this very popular law repealed. This just reconfirms how much the world needs to break the monopolies. They have more money than sense and are resorting to despotic tactics to protect profits.

france24.com/en/live-news/2025

@skorp @aleksandrayulia@floss.social that comment is definitely interesting, but difficult to unpack. Is there any more info on it? DMCA is US law, would this approach be legal elsewhere, like Brazil, Canada or EU?

Big companies making money from are complaining that they have to implement age restrictions. They are a $73 billion industry built on the internet and software. They can easily fund the creation of privacy preserving age verification systems on their sites. It is not that hard. I think they actually don't care about the privacy of their users. The websites should do the age verification, then access methods like VPNs are irrelevant.

politico.eu/article/porn-indus

"In #Canada, #Brazil, #Colombia, #Indonesia and #Australia and beyond, tech giants like #Google and #Meta have deployed aggressive #lobbying strategies to derail or weaken legislation aimed at regulating digital platforms — often through opaque influence networks and #disinformation campaigns. The biggest casualty? The public’s right to reliable information."

New reporting out by Reporters Without Borders together with 17 news outlets:

rsf.org/en/big-tech-s-attempts

@aleksandrayulia@floss.social have you or any other people looked into "advanced protection"? It is designed to make it easy to prevent apps from running on non-Play devices.

support.google.com/googleplay/

"...adds an encryption layer to your app's anti-tampering defenses. This prevents the app from running on insecure devices, making it much harder for attackers to analyze or tamper with it in those environments."

@aleksandrayulia@floss.social @fdroidorg The EC mostly definitely care about this a lot. When fighting trillion dollar companies with a staff of 20 people, nothing will happen fast. It is important to set reasonable expectations here. Also, the companies have such massive monopoly profits, they can afford to spend billions fighting all legal efforts to curtail their power. We have a chance here because well crafted technical replies are many orders of magnitude more effective than their tricks

@rene_mobile If 's "disabling" actually just left some read-only files on the system partition, and the presence of those files had no other effect besides taking up disk space, then it seems like it could be called equivalent to uninstalling.

@adbenitez @aleksandrayulia@floss.social @fdroidorg Both and have been designated gatekeepers under the , they both must open up. If we want the to address our concerns, we must help them as much as possible. They are 20 working on vs /#Tiktok market cap of many trillions. Plus they have massive profits.

It turns out that technical ground truth provides us with an amazing ability to pop their legal strategies.

“Try to minimize what you take with you across the border to only the essentials,” EFF’s @legind advises international travelers in @WIRED. “If you are taking a vacation, do you really need that work laptop with you?” wired.com/story/1password-trav

I was really hoping things might get better with GDPR enforcement at its Irish lead regulator, but this is Ireland giving the middle finger to EU data protection and to a democratically governed digital society.
noyb.eu/en/former-meta-lobbyis

@aleksandrayulia@floss.social @fdroidorg There are many organizations building a case against Google on this. Would you like to join in? Also, it would be helpful if you posted your argument publicly, like on the GrapheneOS blog.

@aleksandrayulia@floss.social @fdroidorg Could you point us to what you told the ? And could you share their actual response? We're working on building a case against it, that will require a lot of solid evidence and campaigning.

The intersection of the new #Google Developer Verification Policy and the #EU #DMA needs to be pondered.

Article 6.4? Yes, in need of an update, sooner rather than later.

#FDroid keeps showing the way forward: f-droid.org/2025/09/22/google-

On 21 October the FSFE :fsfe: is participating as intervener in the hearing of the Apple vs.@EUCommission case at the Court of Justice of the EU 🇪🇺 .

This case is a milestone in the enforcement of the #DMA, and it will shape the future of #FreeSoftware and fair digital markets.

💪 Support us so we can keep defending user rights against big tech monopolies!

fsfe.org/news/2025/news-202509

We're not only building #opensource, we're also using open source - whether it's Odoo, Nextcloud, Matrix, Drupal. What are your favorite open-source tools? 😎

#italy #journalism 

Show more
image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml