Sebastian Krzyszkowiak @dos@librem.one

@stfn W tę stronę to żaden problem; gorzej, gdy trzeba ciąć 😜

@ridge BTW. Photos from Librem 5 look more like this:
https://social.librem.one/@dos/114035748117789854
https://social.librem.one/@dos/114541817150368216
https://social.librem.one/@dos/114941740757004551
https://social.librem.one/@dos/114540898853088761

It's not that hard to get there once the sensor works, but it requires some domain knowledge and the community is too small to just have enough people with it around. Lots of low hanging fruits there across devices.

@ridge It looks like demosaicing with incorrect pixel order, bad white balance and no color calibration. Just make the same mistakes to recreate it anywhere you want ;)

@janvlug @cpontvieux @fraggle You need to load a different kernel module, the default one expects a battery with integrated coulomb counter. This will also affect the LED (it isn't hardware controlled). SHR Settings should let you do that with a button press, but don't get mad at 16yo me if it doesn't work reliably 😁

@rail @mgorny https://media.ccc.de/v/38c3-what-s-inside-my-train-ticket

@attie > Okay, so is it a USB C alt mode? (e.g: DP) ... almost certainly no, because it also has USB A ports.

It almost certainly is DisplayPort alt-mode, especially with that 4K@30Hz cap that matches the available bandwidth on 2 lanes of DP1.2 which you get when sharing the lanes with USB 3 ports.

@pavel It looks off - I'm afraid this is effectively an upscaled 524x778 stream. Your yuyv function throws half of the horizontal resolution away by duplicating the pixels' luminosity (and that's in addition to regular chroma subsampling that will happen there, which wouldn't be as noticeable on its own).

@grzeeesiek @stfn Gęściej niż u mnie SKM/KM 🥺

@pavel Indeed: https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/Phosh/phoc/-/merge_requests/706

@kpcyrd @cwebber @dpk Even without these clauses the outcome would likely be similar in western jurisdictions if a hostile takeover was attempted, but there's of course no way to know for sure without actually having a court decide (at which point it's already costing you time, effort and money), so every bit of reassurance/deterrence helps anyway 😁

@lanodan @dpk @cwebber It is true - but it's not exactly relevant when it was pretty much done in best interest of everyone involved. Law is (supposed to be) a tool to protect interests of people, not the other way around.

@cwebber @dpk Now tell me, what did the courts say about that when handling lawsuits from copyright holders who were hurt by this? 😉

@cwebber @dpk Courts operate not just on the license's letter, but also its spirit, so taking over FSF to publish a permissive GPLv4 wouldn't necessarily be as effective as it may seem at first glance - even if it would still cause plenty of chaos. In contrast, the spirit of this joke license is pretty much "an overly complex way to say it's MIT-0/0BSD" - that is, unless a court decides otherwise, judging from the whole context around a particular case and particular people involved ;)

@dpk @cwebber There's no need for any takeover, there are licenses on these lists that let you freely relicense to anything you want already.

@cwebber That would be indistinguishable from 0BSD

@brie Perhaps, but I only looked into the logs now that I finished the thing I was using sshfs for. It turns out that sshfs isn't even maintained anymore, so I'll probably just rely on kio instead in the future 😉