elgregor @elgregor@librem.one

@openstreetmap I think you mistook content warnings for image descriptions aka alt text.

@slavistapl Podobno Polska obecnie się sprzeciwia, gorzej z innymi krajami. Źródło: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/take-action-to-stop-chat-control-now/

@noelreports The new Polish government seems to seek savings. Not sure if that is the reason.

@panoptykon @noybeu @UODO Często oprócz łatwo dostępnego przycisku "odrzuć", trzeba jeszcze wyrazić sprzeciw wobec uzasadnionych interesów, co jest już zakopane głębiej, a czasem nawet wymaga osobnego kliknięcia dla każdej firmy.

@noelreports NATO is not at war with Russia. You can tell that by the fact that Russia exists.

@eff Meshtastic seems to be a cool project. It would be a shame if they were impacted by a random company.

@noelreports I wonder how much of an impact it will have?

@EUCommission Hope EU will develop actually useful AI, e.g. for trash sorting, quality control, time series prediction, text and audio translation, TTS and STT, purely on-device personal assistants, etc.

@joaocosta @noelreports Most likely the discussion is whether to allow shooting down targets without visual confirmation. The reason it's currently not allowed is the possibility of accidentally misidentifying civilian aircraft and shooting them down.

@noelreports Is this perhaps connected to Iran's sale of ballistic missiles to Russia?

@hindsight @noelreports Likely he wants to play all sides. As a NATO member and a neighbor of Russia, he's against Russian aggression. Nevertheless, he still wants to do business with Russia.

@panoptykon Co do owego dylematu, przypomina mi się wypowiedź założyciela Wikipedii, tzw. "przypowieść o nożu do steków". https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Przypowie%C5%9B%C4%87_o_no%C5%BCu_do_stek%C3%B3w

@GreenFire @noelreports It would be preferable to shoot them down before they enter NATO airspace, but the countries near Ukraine/Belarus don't want to act on their own. They want it to be approved by other NATO members, so there's NATO backing in case Russia responds with an escalation. So far, other NATO countries are reluctant to approve shooting down drones over Ukraine.

@Shatur @davidrevoy I found a helpful illustration: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/distributopia/src/branch/main/sticker-bay/promo-1/mascots-13-2021.jpg
She's a Misskey mascot. The octopus is PeerTube, the fox girl is Pleroma, but who is the sloth?

@nicolaottomano @noelreports Romania and Poland want NATO to confirm that this is regular self defense and not an escalation. This is so they are protected in case Russia considers this an escalation and responds in force. So far, NATO is reluctant to confirm that. Thus, Romania and Poland refrain from acting - they are afraid of finding themselves in a war without NATO support. They sent a lot of weapons to Ukraine and don't even have enough for their peacetime military, let alone wartime.

@GreenFire @noelreports Kaliningrad could become to Russia what Taiwan is to China, but that would require its inhabitants to actually want it.

@PatrikSchoenfeldt @noelreports Not always. Sometimes there's not much fighting. Ukraine took Suja pretty much intact and Kherson had only partial damage.

@kukrak @icd @panoptykon Tu jest info: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/take-action-to-stop-chat-control-now/

Najwięcej mogą ludzie z innych krajów, bo Polska już jest przeciw. Mimo to warto uświadamiać polityków.

@noelreports Russia keeps insisting that war isn't hell, but a fun playground.