elgregor @elgregor@librem.one

@eobet @itsfoss I work with those and very much would like to see them replaced. I do not find the idea of a bugtracker and a wiki to be inherently evil.

@csepp @EUCommission AFAIK the main problems are cost, materials, longevity, and efficiency. Today the main problem with graphene is its high cost. Developing ways to produce it cheaper would bring down the cost of energy storage (directly through cheaper graphene-using batteries, but also through those batteries having better properties).

As to energy usage patterns, you can adjust them somewhat, but in the end you'll still need grid storage.

@csepp @EUCommission Batteries are needed because sun doesn't shine at night and our energy usage patterns don't align with sun intensity during the day. Here's a simple explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-k5uS7ALXk

It's not a "magic solution". Grid storage is necessary if we want to completely remove fossil fuels, unless you want to build thousands of nuclear power plants worldwide.

@csepp @EUCommission What? We *very much do* need better and cheaper batteries because renewable energy is intermittent.

@eobet @itsfoss Jira and Confluence are the Torment Nexus?

It's better to read the article rather than post unrelated grievances based on vague vibes from the title.

@itsfoss Good. Jira is has bugs on top of being proprietary.

@quincy @EUCommission If high tech is used for monitoring plants and micromanaging them (like administering pesticides or fertilizer only around plants that need it), I don't see the downside. If high tech disappeared, you'd probably have to use more pesticides/fertilizer, but you wouldn't be prevented from growing food.

@eff Pixelfed is Fediverse's alternative to Instagram.

@IncHulk @EUCommission This comment section is nothing. Outside of Mastodon, I have seen threads with hundreds of comments spreading Russian propaganda written by clearly fake accounts that don't know the local language well.

@GrapheneOS Ping: @lindorferin @minimalblue
Have you considered disclosing vulnerabilities to GrapheneOS in addition to Google?

Unrelated feedback: it would be nice if your Mastodon profiles would be listed on https://taptrap.click/#team along proprietary services.

@GrapheneOS Thanks for your hard work!

@micr0 I only just found out about it. That's great! Technological sovereignty is a worthy goal.

@EUCommission It wasn't mentioned in the toot, but there's a call for feedback, open until 30 September 2025. For details, click the link.

@eff Most of the listed features make it seem like a GrapheneOS wannabe. To which I reply: "look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power".

@noelreports "If you keep saying that we might attack Europe, we will attack Europe and put you in a Siberian gulag!"

Does he even think for a second before clicking "send"?

@GrapheneOS I agree with you that F-Droid is being silly, as that toast is not actionable and as you say, stock OS permission additions/splits will trigger it.

But I am surprised by how you handled it. You wrote a highly valuable technical comment on their GitLab, but for some reason added unrelated grievances to it and then copy-pasted it many times all over this GitLab issue. This is rude and unprofessional. Many projects would delete these comments and warn you, or even ban you.

@etam @madargon @davidrevoy Kill me plz.