ruff @ruff@librem.one

@GossiTheDog I wonder how many waf blocks it triggered on various digital gov platforms

@dcz You can make solid stone transparent by adding alpha component to colors.txt for the stone block but the view is awkward so i don't use it much.

@dcz and bird view (+20) of the same region

@dcz here's sample of layer -40

@dcz i'm using git@github.com:minetest/minetestmapper.git for underground view, created a script which slices world in layers and then simple image viewer (feh) to navigate through layers

@dcz even more so when you remember you did it once already but was lazy enough to not label it properly and now need to repeat again, only to find out again it is some unimportant level or bit shifter

@mntmn strange, but nxp produces these marvell chips
https://www.nxp.com/products/wireless-connectivity/wi-fi-plus-bluetooth-plus-802-15-4/2-4-5-ghz-dual-band-2x2-wi-fi-5-802-11ac-plus-bluetooth-5-3-solution:88W8997#LCA

@mntmn I think imx only provides mac phy but radio on the soc is marvell
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/mwifiex

@mntmn
[ 14.136136] btmrvl_sdio mmc1:0001:2: sdio device tree data not available
[ 14.378465] mwifiex_sdio mmc1:0001:1: WLAN is not the winner! Skip FW dnld
[ 14.766218] mwifiex_sdio mmc1:0001:1: WLAN FW is active
[ 14.829237] mwifiex_sdio mmc1:0001:1: info: MWIFIEX VERSION: mwifiex 1.0 (16.68.1.p197)
[ 14.837651] mwifiex_sdio mmc1:0001:1: driver_version = mwifiex 1.0 (16.68.1.p197)

The box has both marvell and atheros, can say that atheros has better reception but marvell also ok

@mntmn Other than that - I have Marvell SDIO card but that has both BT and WIFI on SDIO

@mntmn I meant mpcie of course. Ok got it, means BT should be uart or sdio bcz there's no USB bus on MB. I think ralink rt3290 which I tried first on reform was with BT-over-pci, but I didn't like it and replaced with intel. That has bt on usb but I don't use bt much on reform.

@mntmn why not pci-e?

@dcz could it be a copycat from this? Or it's has more legs?
https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/asm330lhh.pdf

@malcircuit never used discord. But is it any better if forum is based on discourse? I mean same shit packaged in different wrapper. I think where you are leading to is we stop using "ready to consume" products and start _cooking_ at least a lil'bit (to prevent becoming products ourselves)

@SwiftOnSecurity luckily in Europe Santa is only known from US movies, so unfortunate but not disastrous circumstances

@Lyude as a matter of fact. so please do document and opensource

@dcz when i was kid we were removing such balls from big (irrigation) water pumps

@SwiftOnSecurity @GossiTheDog it's the complexity versus business risk, multiplied by cost-saving on operations. I.e. by being a high-profile company you end up with
1. complex setup of the infrastructure (built by multiple siloed teams)
2. high profile apps/services with high visibility and criticality
3. ops saving leading to attrition of staff and hence eradication of knowledge

Net result - ops can never formulate proper risk profile hence never get approval from the busness for maintenance