@xmpp @singpolyma seems it does not follow cname? or it does not tell if domain is ok already?
@daniel So then simple minimal requirement:
Server must implement endpoint + unique for tlsv1.2 if it advertises PLUS and exporter + endpoint for tlsv1.3. Client may support either endpoint or unique for 1.2 and exporter or endpoint for 1.3 if it attempts to support PLUS
@daniel I went to add it to my domain just to realize with a big surprise I have already set it (don't remember that at all).
@daniel well yes, I'm aware about that problem, but I think the best we can do is just restrict that a rigid rules (1.2=cert+uniq, 1.3=cert+exporter) as otherwise you need to bring in signing and verification into stream feature negotiation which are usually working at different layers and not always can use each other's data.
@daniel I thought sasl-scram-plus is supported by majority client/server implementaitons?
@SwiftOnSecurity to hell with those vulnerabilities. I'm tired patching them, pulling the plug
@Zeb_Larson Yes we are all individuls, we are all different
The EU intends to add surveillance to end-to-end encrypted chats, including the use of AI powered scanners that should (generically) detect Child Sexual Abuse Material and grooming & report to Europol. Yesterday, I presented on this terrible proposal in a hearing of the Dutch parliament. Here is an English transcript of my very plain language explanation of how bad this all is: https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/client-side-scanning-dutch-parliament/ /cc @echo_pbreyer
@mntmn And how it behaves without? I mean is it just adding external noise filtering (eg you shouldn't worry about proper internal wiring) or internal (without it the screen is always unstable)?
@Sheril I disagree
@vanitasvitae @florida_ted this season at octoberfest I've been introduced into secret code of the secret dress code - the skirt knot coding
@josch 30 and something years ago I bought my first zx spectrum clone, that was with schematics. It was first and last time, before I bought MNT reform laptop and Librem5 phone, both with schematics.
@SwiftOnSecurity more like a threat singer
@gigabecquerel true dat
@vitriolix @jonw0224 @Raspberry_Pi@raspberrypi.social
I've meant rpi compatible (gpio/i2s/spi/etc) boards. I have all versions of rpis up to 4th, but I really doubt I'd buy 5th, after being disappointed with rpi4 performance (3 is smoother having less latency tbh, even though slower)
@jonw0224 @Raspberry_Pi@raspberrypi.social depends on bang for the buck ratio, there are much faster boards out there for quite some time
@mntmn hey mr. DJ put my cpu board on