@purism I really, really want to trust you folks. Your work is super exciting.

What actions have you taken to address the concerns around your privacy and infrastructue issues brought up about both LibremOne and other results of the Yale Privacy Lab report twitter.com/YalePrivacyLab/sta

I WANT TO LOVE YOU GUYS!

Follow

@emacsen

We're ok with you loving us. :)

Our marketing director answered all of the questions in that Twitter thread. But we would, of course, be available to answer any questions you have.

Are there items you are specifically concerned about? Privacy is, obviously, rather a big deal for us! :)

@purism Where did they address it? I saw "I want to address it" but not anything more than that.

Can you point to something in depth?

@purism
My concern is that forking applications and removing the maintainers branding without talking to them first, doesn't really seem like "Working well with upstream", even if it's within the letter of the GPL etc. Eg. The maintainer of #Tusky @ConnyDuck didn't seem particularly thrilled at how you worked "with" them.

#FOSS is all about collaboration and community.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml