While I publicly applaud and support the efforts from @purism to deploy and run services' platform, I think there are some valid concerns that need some public clarification: upstream projects not explicitly mentioned (not everybody will go check commits sent upstream) or features explicitly removed that hurt interoperability (mastodon reports or public/fed timeline) to name two. IMHO if that information is not ready/curated, public launch should have been delayed.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml