m0xEE @m0xee@librem.one

@theorytoe
Nah, they only do it when it's some dev, who might hold opinions hostile to them, but who otherwise has zero impact over their lives, and whom they can safely pick on.
They will keep using Node.js even if Google starts gassing them: "What choice do I have?"
So pathetic! 🤦
They seem to have also forgotten that cancel culture wasn't about harassing the one they don't like days on end. Bullying is only bad when bad people do it, didn't? 😏

@santiago
> from internal IDE drive (fast enough really)
When I boot an old Mac from its internal "spinning rust" drive, I get the vibes that it has an SSD — simply because having bazillion things running in the background simply wasn't common back in the days, so starting them up didn't take forever 😂

@tennoseremel
Ну, «говно» там судя по всему давно уже варили — в славном городе Тосно, а вот пицца — действительно что-то новое 😂
@neural_meduza

@iska
Not unless you have a corresponding t-shirt 😉

@Hyolobrika
We already have one in form of UN — which is what I think it's based on in most science fiction.
True, in its current form it's rather important, but as far as I can see it — it's interplanetary issues arising is what is supposed to make it less dysfunctional, in this scenario the power might indeed shift away from national governments — at least it doesn't look unrealistic to me 🤷

@romin
The watch? 🤔

@romin @sun
But why use racist browser when you can use one by nice people from Google? Yes, in a way they are worse than Nazis, but at least they don't assume that the user is male! (aren't picky about whom to milk for data 😏)

@vertka
It is! According to the paper, this CVE happened because important code, which in turn was a fix for similar prior vulnerability, was removed from one of the routines — hence its name: regreSSHion.
This machine was using 9.1p1 and I've downgraded to 8.4p1 instead of upgrading to 9.8p1 — because according to the paper versions above 4.4, but below 8.5p1 shouldn't be affected.
So in a way it's still a fix, just an unusual one 😄

@romin

@vertka @romin
Nah, tried everything in the book — no success 🤷
It even works when I run binary from the build directory directly, which is extremely odd. This machine might have many… "peculiarities" as I build most stuff myself and it's not as clean as when software is installed with a package manager.
But I'm not motivated enough to investigate it further, besides, 8.4p1 built on the same machine with the same tools and with the same set of libraries works without a hitch — so why bother 😅

@iska @RustyCrab @leftover76
.unwrap_or("🌊")

And I don't want to investigate why this shit doesn't work so I'm just downgrading.

Can I have my old computing back please — without all this complexity? When vulnerabilities with such a severity happened once in a few years instead of every other month 😩

Fuck it! I'm just downgrading to OpenSSH_8.4p1, which is supposedly unaffected. Because this newly patched OpenSSH_9.8p1 simply doesn't work on the only one of my systems that should be affected (32-bit, glibc).
It just crashes before any key exchange even starts — what's odd, it works when its binary isn't in /usr/local/sbin — it doesn't depend on whether the binary is stripped or anything else — it's just about the path, 9.1p1 and 8.4p1 built on the same system work, this one doesn't 🤬

@iska
> You can pay a full year at a top-tier university like MSU with that money.
Which would be just as useless 😂
After I've seen an MIPT graduate who couldn't make a simple loop in Python, and MIPT towers above MSU when it comes to technical education, you won't convince me that education is worth anything in this country, @newt claims that it's like that everywhere.