Show more
m0xEE boosted

Musk claimed that Signal has unpatched security vulnerabilities. As a cryptography expert I’m not aware of any: instead Signal has top-notch state-of-the-art encryption which has been adopted by its competitors it’s so good.

Telegram isn’t end-to-end encrypted by default. It has no group chat encryption whatsoever. It uses a bizarre, badly designed “MTProto” protocol about which dozens of cryptography papers have documented myriad unfixed flaws.

Show thread

@Dicey
Does this mean that you're admitting that you've been wrong before and it's not someone else, but you yourself are bringing that up?
Wow, Fedi is indeed unique! 😁
@meso @Hyolobrika

m0xEE boosted

@paul @sidereal @jasonkoebler
Imagine our bright future:
— Why didn't you send me that email?
— I couldn't, my AI broke down 🤪

@mirabilos @jasonkoebler @koteisaev
GPS is commodity hardware nowadays, using local beacons might involve implementing some things from the ground up 🤷
But I might be wrong about it, I'm not really sure what they use.

@aetataureate @sinituulia
Dual? Mine look like I only have one cat, at some point a part of it chipped off and became a cat of its own, but sometimes it gets reassembled back together 😹😹

@gabriel
I'd agree with you, however for those who can get this metaphor, sexualised violence isn't exactly news — there are young boys who could learn something from it, but they would feel alienated by having to accept the guilt despite doing nothing wrong personally and by the premise that there's something fundamentally wrong with them.
Unfortunately there are girls who take things for face value too, check out the article I have linked here: social.librem.one/@m0xee/11242

@MicheleV_AK @otterX

@dashrb
Oh, wait, maybe Slate is some right-wing conspiracy website? Nope, looks pretty centrist, left leaning even. And the author of the article is a woman 🤔
According to the article, it's even banned in most of the rest of the world, except US, where "womens' rights have been stripped to the bone".
Well, maybe eugenics was only wrong when Nazis did it, queer couples with correct political alignment can do it right 😏

@MicheleV_AK @otterX

@dashrb
And, news at eleven, you aren't really helping women by "speaking out" on social media — the only thing you can achieve this way is to get social approval, and you did! Congrats!
So, what exactly did I personally do to make "them" feel unsafe, disagree with the false premise?
Maybe numerous threads like this one about something being fundamentally wrong with men had more to do with it?
Welcome to the brave new world created by it: slate.com/technology/2024/05/i

@MicheleV_AK @otterX

@dashrb
That's right, some communities have been discussing abusive behaviour so often that it got normalised, and some women failed to notice when they adopted it themselves.
The one, who values your opinion doesn't do that if you disagree.
But you went further yourself and started putting words into my mouth. Whose feelings did I discredit? Hello! Council of Women isn't in the room with us — it's only the author of the original post, whom I disagree with.

@MicheleV_AK @otterX

@dashrb
Starts the conversation with devaluing you, using an extremely broad categorization, tells you to shut up and listen, gives you a morsel of approval only if you behave, and if you disagree with something, tells you to "fuck off" and starts acting as if you're the problem? I'll give you a hint — that's what manipulators do. Were I a girl saying that my significant other does this to me, I would be told that these are red flags.

@MicheleV_AK @otterX

@dashrb
Oh, yes, the Council of Women have spoken and now the Council of Men which simply wasn't aware of the problem has to issue a decree for all men to act accordingly… But it can't — because someone on the social media isn't taking it seriously 😱
Bad news however, the Council of Men doesn't exist. Same as the Council of Women — but there are those who like to speak on behalf of all (or most like in this case) women.
BTW you know who else exhibits such behaviour?

@MicheleV_AK @otterX

m0xEE boosted

@m0xEE @kaia
I can do better, it's six months this time!

@inhosin
s/тем повествования/темп повествования/
ТемП конечно же 😅

@inhosin
Как раз, если бы эти события разнесли на два отдельных фильма, мне кажется было бы лучше — но это коммерческое кино, и видимо, если бы тем повествования остался как в первом фильме, это был бы провал.
Всё ещё не значит, что это плохой фильм — он очень хороший. Но не шедевр, каким его многие считают.

@inhosin
Да нет, финал как раз вполне законченный, если будет третий фильм, то насколько я понял, он будет не прямым продолжением истории.
А на счёт остального — согласен полностью. Первый фильм был чисто про экспозицию, сюжета было минимум, но за счёт этого была атмосфета. Тут же она рушится из-за того, как плотно спрессован сюжет.

m0xEE boosted
Soviet actor Georgi Burkov in his memoirs first released in 1998 (found by Maxim Mirovich):

> The Bolsheviks need the atomic bomb to stay in power, i.e. against their own people. It won't be long before they start blackmailing the whole world, so that the whole world begs us, the people, not to make a revolution and to tolerate these ghouls and support them

Very much to the point both then and now.

@kravietz
So true! And it was always the case: "We need nuclear weapons to protect our sovereignty!"— and by sovereignty they always understand the ability to keep torturing own people indefinitely.

Show more
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml