If it's true that Pixiv is no longer going to be allowing artwork which portrays *fictional and non-existent* characters which are "minors" or in "non-consensual" situations, I will consider closing my account and never returning to the platform. They will also lose me as a premium paying customer.

Censorship of things which don't even exist in reality.

If people can't handle that, their minds have already become dangerous enough to not be able to distinguish between fiction and reality, making them a problem to humanity. The artwork is not the issue here, the fallacious and conditioned cultist mindset of the offended parties is.

@inference How could you do that to this fictional and non-existent character who is a minor?! She is some fictional and non-existent character's daughter!
🤣

@m0xee The "loli" ideology is outright ridiculous. Child protection laws exist to protect children, who can have their lives ruined, not drawings which do not, cannot, and will never, have feelings or lives to be ruined. Drawings can be whatever age you want them to be, and the concept of age does not apply to things which are not alive, anyway.

I'm against real child pornography and exploitation, I will never be against so-called "loli" or anything of the sort which has no basis in reality and literally no one is getting harmed.