If it's true that Pixiv is no longer going to be allowing artwork which portrays *fictional and non-existent* characters which are "minors" or in "non-consensual" situations, I will consider closing my account and never returning to the platform. They will also lose me as a premium paying customer.
Censorship of things which don't even exist in reality.
If people can't handle that, their minds have already become dangerous enough to not be able to distinguish between fiction and reality, making them a problem to humanity. The artwork is not the issue here, the fallacious and conditioned cultist mindset of the offended parties is.
Censorship of things which don't even exist in reality.
If people can't handle that, their minds have already become dangerous enough to not be able to distinguish between fiction and reality, making them a problem to humanity. The artwork is not the issue here, the fallacious and conditioned cultist mindset of the offended parties is.
Follow
@inference How could you do that to this fictional and non-existent character who is a minor?! She is some fictional and non-existent character's daughter!
🤣
@m0xee If people can't tell the difference between reality and fiction, they need help.
@inference I don't believe that the fact that you like shooting daemons in the video game Doom will eventually make you get a shotgun and take it to the streets to shoot people. But apparently some believe otherwise. Debate as old as fiction itself. Never gets old 🤷
I think this time it's not about having a real victim either.
@m0xee Exactly my point. Violent video games and even movies are not only legal, but *promoted*, yet drawings of less abusive and violent cartoons are not.
Complete fallacy.
Complete fallacy.
I'm against real child pornography and exploitation, I will never be against so-called "loli" or anything of the sort which has no basis in reality and literally no one is getting harmed.