Old Fucking Punk @lwriemen@librem.one

@librico @malteengeler I think the term AI is rather poisoned now.

Machine Learning as a term isn't.

When most folks think about AI they are thinking ChatGPT.

So focusing on specific parts of machine learning and naming their specific purpose is all we can do.

Call a neural network that, explain the specific models to train them.

Refer to the older Knowledge Based Systems to refer to the curation and rules for these models.

Abandon AI as an overall term. The marketers have it now.

@librico Thank you for pointing that out. What I wanted to stress is that niche use cases like protein folding are frequently used to justify "AI" in a way that has little to do with what "AI" stands for: (commercial, LLMs, extraction , exploitation, domination).

Last call for all things July!
Last chance to become a FOPM and get this traditional tattoo/untraditional publishing tee: https://pmpress.org/index.php?l=product_detail&p=1936
Last chance to shop the 250 sale: https://pmpress.org/index.php?l=product_list&c=277
Last chance to get 20% off July new titles with code JULY.

Kind of shocking whenever I check up on the blog of somebody I used to respect who now earnestly seems to believe AGI is here.

Feels like it’s happening more and more these days.

@eff LLMs are certainly even-handed and equitable doing cognitive and environmental damage, and they'll violate the copyright of anyone regardless of their being rich or poor.

Let's not start looking at access to these vampiric systems as being a human right. They're no more necessary than cigarettes or non-fungible tokens.

All Americans have a First Amendment right to record law enforcement. This includes ICE and CBP. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/07/eff-guide-recording-law-enforcement #ICE

One rhetorical trick AI vendors & boosters use to steamroll over concerns - like the lack of demonstrable ROI - is to paint the LLM future as "inevitable".

It doesn't matter that the end product is worse, or that productivity gains are elusive.

Go all-in or "get left behind". It is *inevitable*

In reality, what's *inevitable* is that this technology will have to become profitable in the not-too-distant future.

The CFO has entered the chat, and we have no good answers for them.

paper and a pen, and I'd taken my small whiteboard with me, and I guided them through drawing a little mushroom house.

When I gave the paper and pen out, everyone was groaning and mumbling about 'not being an artist' and expressing general daunted sentiments about the impending task of requiring to draw something.

While I guided them through the drawing, everyone was giggling, and oohing and ahhing.

In a few scant minutes everyone had drawn a cute mushroom house with some bugs and flowers -

I did it. It's a blog post.

Ideally, publishers—like librarians—should see themselves as guardians of the culture, but, well . . . 🤷

Ready for a legal breakdown of the literary agent model?

Me: Why make all those people angry?
Also me: But this is what I'm thinking about.

Along the way, I’ll offer a personal publishing horror story and advice to writers considering traditional publishing.

So here goes. (Warning: I think the rebel in me is coming out.)

https://terikanefield.com/traditional-publishing-and-the-pitfalls-of-the-literary-agent-model/