Show more

In addition, despite claims that ShotSpotter only records audio of gunshots, the microphones are in fact always on, and there have been instances of the police submitting ShotSpotter recordings of human voices as evidence in criminal trials.

Show thread

Did.a video on the raw milk thing!

Contents: media literacy about agriculture & lots of talk about poop. Because cows

youtu.be/piB_DdO2D6I?si=LWwsq-

BROOKLYN! Pop in at 6pm tonight for a screening of InterRebellium @ P.I.T. (Property is Theft), organized in collaboration with the NYC anarchist book fair.

#Trump’s tax bill to cost 830,000 jobs and drive up bills and pollution emissions, experts warn - theguardian.com/environment/20 "demolish key components of climate legislation signed by Joe Biden that has spurred a record torrent of renewable energy and electric vehicle investment in the US."

We cleaned up our forgejo setup & noted down the steps needed to sso intrgrate forgejo in keycloak:

domaindrivenarchitecture.org/

#forgejo #sso #keycloak

Recent leaks have undermined the kinds of lies that the drafters of the Constitution intended journalists to expose when they wrote the First Amendment’s press clause.

That’s exactly why journalist-source confidentiality needs protecting.

freedom.press/issues/recent-le

"I believe this process has created a symbolic society — one where people are elevated not by any actual ability to do something or knowledge they may have, but by their ability to make the right noises and look the right way to get ahead. The power structures of modern society are run by business idiots — people that have learned enough to impress the people above them, because the business idiots have had power for decades..."
[link in previous toot]

Show thread

This is probably obvious to everyone already, but I jotted down a brief note about why having a `robots.txt` matters when creating tarpits for LLM bot zombies scouring the web for content--even when, especially when, they don't read them.

inkdroid.org/2025/05/22/tarpit

@GuerillaOntologist I was just talking to a friend last night, who is a medical transcriptionist. Whatever company she works through is replacing them with "AI". The physicians would have to pay out of pocket to keep a human transcriptionist. She mentioned how speech recognition was already being used, but it required editing. With all the ESL medical professionals entering the field and hard-to-pronounce drug names, there's surely nothing to worry about.

This is how our society ends: with the "smart" people committing voluntary intellectual suicide. Congratulations to all the AI bandwagon-hoppers out there - this is what your ignorant enthusiasm has helped to create. Oh well. I suppose it was only a matter of time.

nakedcapitalism.com/2025/05/th

With their votes in favor of a disastrous law giving the cryptocurrency crooks even more incentive to rip off the rest of us, these 16 Democratic senators demonstrated that they are as corrupt as Trump and the Republican party. Everyone's assets are about to be at huge risk.

prospect.org/politics/2025-05-

#Google putting wrong medical advice in their #AI Overviews.

This is not funny. It is not acceptable. Today I saw someone who had asked a health-related question to Google Search. The AI Overview presented mixed-up, wrong information. I urged the person to ignore the AI Overview and use the regular site links.

They didn't know there were any regular site links, because the AI Overview filled essentially their entire window and they didn't know to scroll down. This is a common situation with busy, nontechie users.

They have depended on Google to point them at accurate information for so many years, and now Google Search spews out convincing looking AI garbage. This is not an anomaly.

Google's AI Overviews are full of wrong, partially wrong (even more dangerous!), and just plain misinformation. Answers that are completely reversed from supposed source pages because the AI didn't understand the wording. Measurements wrong. Math wrong.

It doesn't matter how often AI Overviews are correct, because you NEVER KNOW when they're going to be wrong, either completely or partly (again, mixing true with false -- like contaminating a well).

And now Google is trying to convince users to use "AI Search" instead -- "Hey Ma', no more list of blue links!" -- making it even harder to see that so many of their answers are, if you'll excuse the expression, bulls*it, sometimes dangerous as well.

This is unconscionable. Frankly, whether Google understands this or not, this behavior is uncaring and evil. Apparently Google's leadership no longer feels any shame at all. Disgusting.

Online headlines focus more on clicks than clear information, study shows. Researchers say digital news is changing, with headlines written to grab attention instead of just informing readers. 🤨

📝„Over the past 20 years, online news headlines have become longer, more negative, and increasingly focused on click-through rates—regardless of journalistic quality. This is the conclusion reached by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, who analyzed around 40 million headlines from English-language news outlets across the last two decades. Their study has been published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications."

mpib-berlin.mpg.de/press-relea

#study #news #clickbait #negativenews #onlinenews #maxplanckinstitute #journalism

Wonder where it's going?

"i don't understand this economy when nursing homes are so expensive they bankrupt our grandparents but nursing home aides need to use food banks. daycare is so expensive it eats up one parent's entire paycheck and yet daycare providers only make $10/hr and need second jobs

college costs hundreds of thousands of dollars and puts students into debt for life and yet we have thousands of professors living in their cars.

everything we need is astronomically expensive and yet almost none of the money we pay is going towards the people actually doing the work and providing the services."

- @missmayn

#capitalism

Who needs A.I. to make up fake books? I've been doing it for almost a quarter century. patreon.com/BrianMcFadden

Show more
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml