@LogicalDash@cybre.space But is it worthy of the stop recommendation by @skynebula? Or is it more deserving of a caution note?
There seems to be a lot people looking for @purism to stumble, whether due to their no censorship stance, their advertising, or ???
@hypolite
"thought they were a hardware company"
... with the exception of PureOS? ???
"FOSS world ... higher standards"
Are these defined somewhere? Is there a standards committee? ;-)
Is Purism somehow violating copyleft somewhere?
"regular business practices"
I don't have a clue what you're trying to imply here? rebranding? subscription charges? paid employees? ???
@LogicalDash@cybre.space @skynebula @purism
@skynebula
Which ones? The only thing I've seen is that they failed to explicitly state the rebranding aspect. From what I've seen in the code I've looked at, everything seems pretty copyleft compliant.
@lwriemen @hypolite @LogicalDash @purism
They violated so many FLOSS licences (and ethics) when launching Librem One