Show more

@luke I missed the live stream. Will it be possible to view/listen to it later?

A Critique of the Open Letter Calling for the Removal of : meribold.org/2021/04/07/critiq

"Suggesting that RMS is intolerant is strange. If anything, he seems to be too tolerant. Implying that RMS is hateful is just ridiculous."

Pictures from my morning walk the other day, down by the water along Edsviken north of Stockholm. I didn't meet it in person, but something tells me there is a living around here.

@jfred @zwol @brainwane

I was thinking that, regarding Signal, maybe it does not matter so much that there are no commits since April 2020 because we anyway don't know what software they have been running on the server side. We don't know that neither before or after April 2020.

They could run something quite different, that just seems the same from the outside. Or they could just add some secret patches on top of the open-source code.

Or is there some way to verify what the server runs?

@brainwane Don't know, but I always wondered if it makes sense to talk about the server side of anything being open-source.

I mean, on my own computer it makes sense to want open-source software because I can verify it and I can modify it as I want.

But on someone else's server, if they say things are "open-source", I can anyway never verify that, and I can't change anything. In the server case "open-source" is just something they say, sounds good, but I don't know if it is true.

RMS and Rage Against the Machine 

Show thread

RMS and Rage Against the Machine 

Show thread

RMS and Rage Against the Machine 

@xiroux We, human beings, need to control our technology instead of being enslaved by it. Free software allows us to take back control.

@cwebber@octodon.social @fossandcrafts@octodon.social

I did not mean this to become such a long rant, but anyway, there is is.

To summarize: the open letter, supposedly meant to fight for inclusion, itself has a fundamentally flawed approach to inclusion.

Therefore, signing the open letter is not a good thing to do. Note that this issue is bigger than RMS, and bigger than FOSS.

Do you see what I mean?

I have a couple of other comments as well, would you like to hear them?

@cwebber@octodon.social @fossandcrafts@octodon.social

After a while you detect that there are other misogynists in the FOSS world, they must also be removed. Who decides this? The power lies with those who have the magic power to determine who is a misogynist and who is not a misogynist. Note that this is in reality pretty much arbitrary since prejudice affects all of us from time to time, none of us is perfect.

I hope you get the point, why that is not a good system for the future.

(to be continued)

@cwebber@octodon.social @fossandcrafts@octodon.social

The people who signed the letter think that this is how the fight against misogyny is to be done: find the misogynists and remove them. This is problematic in several ways.

To understand why this is bad, consider the future. Assume that you succeed in removing RMS, that terrible misogynist.

(to be continued)

@cwebber@octodon.social @fossandcrafts@octodon.social

The open letter, in labeling RMS as "misogynist" and so on, as if that is his identity, makes a serious mistake.

Apparently, according to the letter, the fight against misogyny is about classifying people into two groups: some are misogynists, others are not misogynist. The people who signed the letter want to tell the world that RMS is a misogynist, while they are not misogynists.

(to be continued)

@cwebber@octodon.social @fossandcrafts@octodon.social

The open letter labels RMS as "misogynist", among other things.

You did mention that one of you found that problematic, but still you seem to look at it as a minor issue since you say you might anyway sign the letter.

Let me explain why it should not be considered a minor issue.

We live in a patriarchy, prejudice against women is everywhere and we are all part of it, we all need to think about how we act.

(to be continued)

@cwebber@octodon.social @fossandcrafts@octodon.social

Thanks for talking about this very important issue.

Having listened and thought about it for a while, I want to voice my disagreement regarding the open letter.

You said that one of you signed and one of you did not sign, but might end up signing after all. So overall that signals that you think it is probably a good idea to sign the open letter.

I object to this. Please hear me out.

(to be continued)

@redstarfish This is wonderful news!

Now if other government entities (local, regional, national) both in Germany and elsewhere look at that and the arguments behind it, how can they not follow suit?

Elias boosted
Elias boosted
Show more
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml