elgregor @elgregor@librem.one

@pantaRhei @EUCommission Such "prohibiting" would only stop people who are technologically illiterate.

@EUCommission EU definitely needs new markets to export to. I'm just concerned about "stronger intellectual property protection". The article only mentions trademarks and anti-counterfeiting protections, which is good. However this sort of language is often used as an euphemism for making copyright and patent laws worse.

BTW if someone is wondering what do we import, article mentions raw materials, plants, and regional food. Some agricultural imports will be banned, some will have quotas.

@itsfoss I instantly thought of Librem 5, but its kill switch setup is slightly different:

- Cellular Modem
- Wireless & Bluetooth
- Camera & Microphone

@noelreports Is it because those countries will hand over ships to Ukraine?

@noelreports It makes tourniquets obsolete.

@noelreports They had plenty of time, which they wasted. There are reliable alternatives. Even when excluding renewables, you can still get fossil fuels from countries other than Russia. I don't know why they are so stubborn on being Russian footrests.

@EDPS @Supervisor I'm glad that you are trying to limit the damage, but it would be better not to share this data in the first place. If US requires this for visa waiver, it's their problem. They can get even less tourists if they want.

@zbrando @EUCommission Common army won't happen anytime soon. There are plenty of issues that would need to be fixed first, like the unanimity you mentioned.

We could at least standardise more stuff. Right now our armoured vehicles use plenty of incompatible radios, so they can talk to their commands, but not to each other. Our rocket artillery should use standardised containers; those standard containers could even be used also for air defence and anti-ship missiles. And so on...

@etam @Watchdog_Polska Podoba mi się podany w debacie pomysł zakazu łączenia mandatu poselskiego z funkcją rządową. Nasza władza ustawodawcza jest zbyt ściśle związana z władzą wykonawczą i taki rozdział nieco poprawiłby sytuację.

@RejoinEU @noelreports This is probably why US sent observers to Belarus - to verify everything with their own eyes and not just trust the words of Belarusian officials.

@EUCommission The report cites an OECD publication about 25 evidence-based potential disruptions affecting policy, which I found interesting: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/foresight-toolkit-for-resilient-public-policy_bcdd9304-en.html

@echo_pbreyer Ask them to pick one:

- messages are encrypted and only the sender and recipient can access their contents
- our software will access message contents to check if they are legal

@BasieP @echo_pbreyer You are right, the e-mail system is fundamentally insecure. Sure, you can use GPG, but it's not widely used, doesn't protect metadata and it still lacks important security properties like forward secrecy.

@noelreports Is this a highly advanced version of the "ёжик чихнул" meme?

@KatS @noelreports First time hearing about this movie, thanks for mentioning it.

@zaufanatrzeciastrona Plus zastrzeżenie, że właściwy adresat również nie może podejmować jakichkolwiek działań w oparciu o zawarte w wiadomości informacje bez uprzedniej pisemnej zgody spółki. Po prostu majstersztyk. 2/2

@zaufanatrzeciastrona Niby jak ktoś mógłby przeczytać tę stopkę bez wglądu w treść wiadomości. Poza tym wysyłając odpowiedź w stylu "hej, wysłaliście pod zły adres", zazwyczaj klient email zacytuje całą wiadomość, co będzie dalszym jej przekazywaniem, kopiowaniem i rozpowszechnianiem. W dodatku zareagowanie na tę stopkę, jak i wspomniane poinformowanie nadawcy, że się pomylił będzie "podjęciem jakichkolwiek działań w oparciu o zawarte w niej [wiadomości] informacje". 1/2

@noelreports Trump wants Russia to side with US in the US-China war. This is why he's so nice to Putin. As we all know, it will backfire.