@Edizionilazio @noelreports But this is kinda true. Peacekeepers only work if they have enough firepower to defeat Russia. Simply stationing a small amount of soldiers in Ukraine will not deter Russia. Only the threat of a powerful counteroffensive will work.
The peacekeepers will also need the approval to destroy any Russian unit that shoots at them. Otherwise Russia is going to constantly harass them with small attacks and then deny anything happened.
@rzeta0 @itsfoss Normally you can disable Secure Boot and then any OS will boot.
A more secure solution would be to get a distro signed by MS (or a distro which signs everything using its own key and then add that key to your allowed key list in UEFI).
For most security, you could get a distro which signs everything using its own key, and then set UEFI to allow only this key and no other. This would prevent dual-boot with Windows though.
@jonpsp @eff Third, as EFF says, the publishers already eat most of the profits, while creators get pittance. The same would happen with any money from AI companies. I wouldn't be surprised if eventually the publishers would be the ones trying to replace creators with AI.
AI is the new face of old problems, a distraction. Instead of narrowly focusing on AI, we should focus on creators directly. Also on the environment directly, on privacy directly, etc. Strike hydra's body, not its newest head.
@jonpsp @eff First of all, we shouldn't treat the AI models (their design, training data, weights, etc.) as property of the companies. Those models should be public, so everyone can benefit, including authors.
Second, don't create new copyright, apply existing one. If you train AI on a million books, pay for a million books. Buying a book should cost money (so authors get paid), reading a book that you own (or training a model on it) should be free.
1/?
@itsfoss Don't mind me, I'm just shilling for ripgrep. https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep
@zaufanatrzeciastrona Dlaczego wymagacie podania adresu do czegoś tak prozaicznego jak wykupienie dostępu do wideo?
@johnnyryan @epicprivacy And of course instead of solving the root cause (invasive data collection), US will instead solve the symptom (ease of access to data on people considered important to US government).
@noelreports Not enough. Russia wants to use the truce to rearm and then attack again. Peacekeeping force must at least be big enough to stop this, but preferably huge enough to deter Russia completely.
@madtulip @noelreports It's intentional. He says everything and anything, looks at reactions, and only then decides what to do. It's been like this since his first presidential campaign, maybe even longer. Seems to work for him.
If I remember correctly, some company made flip-flops with his tweets on them where the tweet on the left one directly contradicted the tweet on the right one.
@noelreports I suspect Russia's rearmament will take significantly more than 3-4 years, but it's better to be ready early rather than late.
@zaufanatrzeciastrona Chyba jedyne AI warte rozważenia przez prywatnego użytkownika, to AI działające lokalnie na urządzeniu. STT, TTS, tłumaczenia, wyszukiwanie obrazów po słowach kluczowych, itd. Nie chcę wysyłać do Google czy Deepl wszystkich napotkanych przeze mnie obcojęzycznych tekstów.
@joaocosta @noelreports That's how I'm reading it. NATO should be strong in Europe, so US (not NATO, only the US) can focus on East Asia.
A dlaczego to przypominamy? Bo Amerykanie odkryli niedawno, że jedna mała firma z Litwy pozyskała taką drogą super wrażliwe dane o amerykańskim personelu wojskowym i członkach wywiadu stacjonujących zagranicą - i je sprzedała innej firmie. Ale nie byłoby to możliwe, gdyby nie organizator całego procederu, czyli Google i jego program Authorized Buyers:
https://www.wired.com/story/rtb-location-data-us-military/
@viq @paul_ward_irl @Binder @EUCommission "The AI effect is the discounting of the behavior of an artificial-intelligence program as not "real" intelligence." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect
@freyaanduin @EUCommission This is why it's crucial to always check AI output, never blindly trust it. To be fair, the same is true for media, politicians, etc.
@zaufanatrzeciastrona Zapewne dowiedział się o podatnościach w bibliotekach od multimediów. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@Mnemosinee @lritter @EUCommission Various kinds of scientific AI likely do count. It would be incredibly stupid to spend all that money solely on LLMs. I didn't even consider that it could be a thing.
@icd Ostatnio chciałem się zarejestrować w usłudze pewnej firmy, ale okazało się, że firma wysyła dane osobowe użytkowników do Facebooka i Google. Dziękuję, nie skorzystam. Jednocześnie bardzo szanuję, że napisali to wprost zamiast zasłaniać się lakonicznymi informacjami o "partnerach biznesowych".
@JustUs4Pali @eff Thanks to the incredibly dysfunctional copyright system, copyright holders are forced to aggressively pursue even minor copyright infringements (like this one), lest they lose their copyright.
Copyright and patent systems need to be nuked from the orbit.