No bailouts for or its depositors. Insurance has always been there, and those companies that didn't buy it are the ones responsible for taking that risk. theguardian.com/business/2023/

If the "U.S. banking system remains resilient and on a solid foundation", as Treasury says, then why do they need to take a special action to bail out depositors who should have gotten insurance for themselves? To me, this looks like yet another for the wealthy and well connected.

Show thread

@eighthave Taking these kind of actions is what keeps the US Banking system on solid foundations. The treasury, FDIC, and Federal Reserve all have been a key component of keeping the system stable through shocks like this.

Follow

@Siberian I think the FDIC is a great idea, my point is that it automatically covers a fixed amount of deposits. This is widely known and documented. Those who deposit more than that in a bank are taking risks. If you have that much much, you have resources to manage risk. But here, we have typical US for the rich. Oops, I left my millions in a risky bank that cratered, the US Gov will bail me out. But if I lost my job and can't pay my mortgage, sorry tough luck, this is !

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml