@terryenglish yes let's move from 1 walled garden to another one that'll solve EVERYTHING lmao.
@yes Are you actually equating Signal and iMessage as if they are equivalent? Signal is indeed centralized but people moving to it would be a huge improvement over iMessage.
@yes Same said about Google Messages.
@terryenglish google messages is planning on implementing racheted encryption and would be, objectively superior to signal when they do.
@yes Ratcheted encryption like the kind that WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Signal, Element and many others already implement? I'm not sure why that sets Google Messages apart. Plus I mean it's Google. π€·ββοΈ
@terryenglish 1 thing, google has the network effect.
@terryenglish you know, the one thing that actually matters when making a chat app. :P
@terryenglish no it would not, iMessage and signal suffers the same problem, centralization by a shitty entity.
@terryenglish signal glows too much to be trusted. @yes
@terryenglish Good, let iFags select themselves out of the wider communication ecosystem. Let 'em maintain their circlejerk as far away from the rest of us as they can.
@cowanon iPhone users are people too. As much as it's sometimes difficult to tell. π
@terryenglish That's the problem. As people, they should know better.
