@newt
> They no longer support DUN or RFCOMM profiles via bluetooth.
For real?! 😲 This sucks!
How does tethering over Bluetooth work then? 🤔 I've never used it TBH.
Dedicated cellular modems still do provide virtual serial port though — but I won't put my money on it, the ones I have are rather old too.
@newt
> PAN.
This has existed since the early days of Bluetooth, but I've never seen it used in reality. Well, with absence of serial interface, looks like its time has come. Why even bother with Bluetooth then and not just use wireless ethernet, is it easier on the battery?
> Those I saw provide a virtual ethernet adapter.
Well, like I said, mine might be just old. I like none of this! First integrated audio interfaces using USB and now this. This is just fucked up, man! 😠
@Aeder
@newt
> No, I mean the Personal Area Network profile in Bluetooth. It also emulated Ethernet.
Yeah, I remember PAN back from the days when my ThinkPad T43 was still brand new — I've never seen it used in real world, yes — why bother when there is Wifi? 🤔
It might make more sense now that Bluetooth LE exists — to save the battery, but I've never tried that myself.
@Aeder
@newt
Woah, turns out that even USB tethering boils down to emulating a USB network interface 😨
How did we even get here? Why bother with all that instead of just using wireless?!
I was always finding those guys annoying, the ones who complain that e.g. new phones do not support Java applications or newer operating systems not supporting older APIs… Except now I'm that guy! 😒
@Aeder
The main reason is probably that Windows networking stack is a fuck. For one, Windows doesn't natively support things like vlans. I'm willing to bet that adding USB-IP support would also be total balls.