When building software, I believe it is important to work in public. Software can give small groups of developers immense power over lots of people. Like how governments work in public and corporations have to be more public than private company, developers should be transparent not only with their source code, but also the discussions and processes while building it. This can be hard to get used to, but not bad once used to it. Great examples of this are and IMHO

@eighthave
I agree, except substitute your example of gitlab for @forgejo

Gitlab has non-foss features.

Follow

@shaadra @forgejo While true that GitLab has proprietary features, the FOSS version is complete and widely used. What I'm talking about is more than just source code. GitLab operates as a company quite openly on gitlab.com and their employee handbook handbook.gitlab.com/ is public and open to all to submit merge requests. Or how Debian/F-Droid dev discussions happen on public forums that anyone can join. FOSDEM is another great example, anyone can just show up and take part in all of it

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml