Follow

"What is up with this? I followed somebody but their toots are not showing up in my timeline!"

Maybe you *requested* to follow them. In the people can choose to approve their followers, and your request might not have been approved, may even have been rejected.

It is a different world view here on compared with the bird site. How many followers is not a good metric here.

One of the more interesting things I have been noticing lately is .

As a site grows in number of active users, they tend to interact *more* with other users who are not on the same instance. The largest instances with real people consistently drop to a bit below 30%.

My working assumption (without specific evidence) is people explore by conversation, exposing themselves to new ideas, people.

There are, of course, exceptions.

Show thread

@wsaewyc Hi! Interesting idea. I wonder if the same happens in reality, for example, as a school grows, the school parents start to talk more with people outside the school.

I did not follow the "The largest instances with real people consistently drop to a bit below 30%." thought, what is that a 30% of?

@gry

If you take a look at fediverse.space/ you will see a visualization of and instances which are public, and some analysis of the public feeds of these instances.

If you take a look at fediverse.space/instance/masto you will see a visualization of Mastodon.uno, an instance which is reasonably large but in a language group which as yet does not have many instances - and its details tab says it is 90% insular - most tweets are within that instance.

1/2

@gry

In contrast, fediverse.space/instance/mamot Mamot.fr, a largish instance, has a 26% insularity ratio - there are mostly mention accounts outside the instance.

That is actually lower than some of the most-active large instances. Mastodon.social, arguably the largest population of real humans, is running 33%. Fosstodon.org is 27%, Anarchism.space a frighteningly low 20%, Social.coop back at 33%.

2/3 (cuz I just thought of an interesting idea)

@gry

It might be the case that insularity also describes the internal health or connectivity of an instance. One I ran across had an insularity of 6%; almost no one is actually talking to each other on the instance - nearly 1k authors saying many things, but shouting into the internet and not developing conversations.

At the other end of the spectrum are a few sites running intensive bot communities. Gab and allies are ~96% and newsbots.eu, bots.h.kher.nl are both 100%.

3/3

@wsaewyc I guess when joining Mastodon people want to meet a smaller group of people. When an instance gets too big, they start finding friends elsewhere?

I think similar problem happens when IRC channels grow, then they just start requiring nick registration for people to join and this limits the growth somewhat. Artificially. I don't like it. I like to think that it would make sense to solve this by splitting the large group into two-three smaller ones by topic.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml