Also Named Bort 🇨🇦 @terryenglish@librem.one

@terryenglish just ask sjw for his follower list

>capitalism/socialism arguments
come on you guys we already figured this out years ago
shitposter_club_file_d3b81dc1a1…

.

guizzy showing mitsu a movie
101332.jpg

The same networks that aired live coverage of a terrorists funeral?
3E1B3F9A-4856-43D2-91CB-9A88868…

Cold as ice.

I wish everyone would quit teasing WW3. It's just going to be a bigger disappointment when it doesn't happen.

Got a new SSD and I am considering reinstalling my PC.
Which distro should I pick?

@mewmew based juche

I'm a fan of pleroma.site's new ToS

@shmibs @barrett @feld Hearing the difference now isn’t the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses near lossless compression, while MP3 is ‘lossy’. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA – it’s about 12kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don’t want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.

I started collecting MP3s in about 2006, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange…well don’t get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. It's ridiculous. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren’t stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you’ll be glad you did.

@daisuke birthday gift for you kiddos starter pack

@Koreko @terryenglish I just took a shower and had a bit of a random thought, the ricky show is probably just controlled opposition?!
Like, the pitchforks go back to the barn again, because "our buddy ricky sure told 'em, eh?" Fuck that entire industry.

@terryenglish @fireglow he looks so smug

good morning freedom