RT @businessinsider@twitter.com
Officials finally found a case of a dead person voting, and it was a Republican pretending to be his dead mom trying to vote for Trump https://t.co/bb8VbK1r5K
@wjmaggos It is an iron rule of US elections that when voting is more convenient, more people vote and when more people vote Republicans lose.
@melmc @wjmaggos @terryenglish universal mail in voting did not cover sending out 1.8 million ballots and getting back 2.6 million. Where did the extra come from? Who counterfeit printed and processed them?
@Borisdpython Are you you referring to Pennsylvania? That's already been debunked as Trump lackeys making shit up again.
https://checkyourfact.com/2020/11/30/fact-check-more-mail-in-ballots-received-returned-pennsylvania/
@FailurePersonified @melmc @Borisdpython @terryenglish
"More than 3 million Pennsylvanians have applied to vote by mail, made possible by a new law the governor signed last year creating the most sweeping election reforms in 80 years."
https://www.governor.pa.gov/newsroom/pennsylvanians-urged-to-hand-deliver-mail-ballots-immediately/
@FailurePersonified Only one link didn't work. The rest of the sources, including the ones for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania worked fine. I suppose the article could be a little more concise but even for nitpicking this is weak sauce criticism.
> lack of evidence
Coping not criticism confirmed.
Do something productive instead of jerking off
If you read it again there's not much that is tangible in evidence or proving a complete lack of evidence to support the rebuttal. Also it's super long when really it should be a few paragraphs at most... it seems to just be padding it out for no apparent reason.
Even regardless of the source's accuracy or supporting evidence (which i couldn't find) my attention span, which is longer then most in the 21st century, i was struggling to get through it.