@igeljaeger For profit corporations are amoral entities. Morality is just not a concern. Any for profit company, had they the opportunity to make money helping the Nazi, would have done the same as IBM. @whiteout@fedi.absturztau.be
@sjw@neckbeard.xyz
@igeljaeger At least in this case the terminology is actually correct. 😀 @whiteout@fedi.absturztau.be @sjw
@sjw @whiteout @igeljaeger @terryenglish tbh the UK, US, and France have been pretty bad for destabilising large parts of the world for economic gain. This isn't even some historical colonial thing, it's even just going back to the 80s for the really open stuff and various dubious things in recent times that time may or may not exonerate.
@sjw Saying that Red Hat is no better than Apple?! I'm sorry but fuck you! Seriously go fuck off and die. @kline @whiteout@fedi.absturztau.be @igeljaeger
@sjw @whiteout @igeljaeger @terryenglish buzzwords tho
For amoral entities concerned only with profit, you sure do see a lot of money-losing behaviors which look like moral choices. For example the Gillette commercial, where the CEO said he had no problem with the fact that it cost the company 8-12 billion dollars.
