Been watching the Tiktoks of some of the 11,000 laid off Meta employees. Almost none of the laid-off people have any technical skills of any kind. They're all in "soft" stuff like "climate," "human rights," recruiting, "diversity officer," morale boosting.

I saw one laid off woman who was a "Niceness Maestro." That may sound like an exaggeration, and I'm sure it is an exaggeration, but I have heard of positions like "Director of Niceness" or the like at Big Tech.

No, I can't link these TikToks because TikTok's search function is terrible and I forgot to download. I looked for them and failed.

These mostly Wymyn are "Human Bloatware" that did next to nothing but take a $300,000 per annum pay check.
Follow

@Aether yep first meta then Amazon, and soon other tech companies will follow

· Librem Social · 1 · 0 · 1
@societyoutcasts Amazon has yet to confirm when but they have already announced they are cutting 10,000 before the end of the month.

finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-to-lay-off-10000-workers-as-soon-a-this-week-report-165308894.html

>The layoffs will impact Amazon's Alexa business, as well as the company's retail and human resources divisions, according to The Times. Amazon's Alexa group, which produces its Echo hardware and associated software, loses up to $5 billion a year, The Wall Street Journal reports, citing internal documents the paper reviewed.

>The 10,000 jobs make up some 1% of Amazon's 1.5 million global workforce. The Times reports that the final number of planned layoffs could change between now and when they're announced. Amazon announced a hiring freeze on Nov. 3.
@Aether @societyoutcasts
>LOSES FIVE BILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR

No actual corporation does this! Bezos you faggot admit that Amazon is just a government institution! We all know it, and there is no other feasible way to have been dumping money like that!
@DasSauerkraut @societyoutcasts It is a web hosting company with loss making online retail and entertainment arms.

On top of that it has a lot of DOD/CIA contracts
@Aether @societyoutcasts
I'm aware, and its sad they're such a heavily used web host as their prices make most ventures unfeasible.
Its just ludicrous how much free gibs that company gets and still gets to be a company. They basically have USPS as their bitch.

>SNAP going down
Had to look it up, SNAP being snapchat, I forget it exists, never used it.
@DasSauerkraut @societyoutcasts SNAP, just like all of the social media giants to greater and lesser extent, is a fraudulent corporation.

They are not actually real businesses as one learns about business in business school. Their nominal customers are not customers, but product for data that they sell to "advertiser, who are not actually advertisers as one is taught in Marketing school, but conduits for free money provided by the Jewish financial system through endless bond issues.

Big tech are totally – and I mean TOTALLY – dependent upon a constant flow of external “investment” money. In most cases, the total “investment” into them far exceeds their actual revenue.

When it comes to Amazon, as we discussed here, if companies could be bothered building their own servers they would save money and kill Amazon in one act

poa.st/objects/023d4855-3fbc-4328-91cf-8406ebe3a278
@Aether @societyoutcasts
Sadly with chip shortages still going on that act may be discourged for atleast another decade while countries reorganize and ramp up new chip production.
@DasSauerkraut @societyoutcasts Even with the chip shortage, it is a saving of more than 80% on operating budget.
What even was the original salespitch? Was it targeted at SMB's who couldn't afford their own fulltime in-house guy while undercutting local contractors? I don't understand how something so expensive got so huge.
@MatebaRespecter @DasSauerkraut @societyoutcasts Because building and maintaining inhouse servers sucks. It takes a lot of time and effort so the CIO typically just outsources it and calls it a day.

See this poast for a link discussing it more

poa.st/objects/fcf9ab2d-40a9-482f-8f26-cd4d1e3aed17
@Aether @MatebaRespecter @DasSauerkraut @societyoutcasts I remember when cloud was great because of economies of scale and server-sharing. Has the excess cost of diversity nogs really caught up to those benefits?
@Aether @MatebaRespecter @societyoutcasts @DasSauerkraut Like a lot of things, it depends. Some workflows make sense in the cloud. Others do not. But most executives can’t tell the difference I use AWS personally for a few small things. It makes sense. But I don’t use it for everything. Even my Fedi instance is hosted by me personally (not a VSP). But I do have a couple of things that makes sense for the cloud.
@Aether @societyoutcasts
Yeah once its up and running but I bet the upfront costs are gonna be prohibitive at first.
@Aether @societyoutcasts
And dare I ask how jewish financiers back up or profit on all those bonds they issue out?
@DasSauerkraut @societyoutcasts In theory stonks keep going up and to the right. These companies are built on the idea of perpetual growth as line go up, profit in trading on line.

Now due to the QT climate they do not have the bond cash the bankers were using so now these companies have had investment dry up and are forced to dump shares to avoid margin calls.

Hence line go down bigly and fast
@Aether @societyoutcasts
Will be nice to see an era where funny money shenanigans are burnt up and gone.
Its just absurd how much of the money and attached power the powers that be have is ultimately anchored in nothing but fucking fiction.

@Aether @DasSauerkraut
That was part of the problem. In another video he says one of his friends who runs a start up in India had his own servers so they wouldn't have to rely on Amazon. The people he hired weren't actually working so he had to shut his servers down and use Amazon's insteadm

@DasSauerkraut @Aether
I watched a video a few months ago of a guy who works in the tech industry. He has friends in these companies and said that they were looking through employees records and noticing a lot of dead weight (people who don't actually do any work). He said that by the end of 2022 these companies would be firing them. The articles about the supposed losses is probably an excuse to not get sued.

@societyoutcasts @Aether
Lol. To a degree it sounds like companies see the end coming of them and are trying to ditch the progressives and diversity hires last minute to try and save themselves.

@DasSauerkraut @Aether at the end of the day these people are self-interested and will do anything to save themselves

>Lawd Dem Rangz cost $1b

>Amazon cuts 10,000 employees

Just assume an average salary of $100k and wow! Look at that coincidence!
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml