Yesterday the Rachel Maddow Show featured my scoop on a Russian disinformation op: Fake news sites meant to look legitimate sharing allegedly "leaked" audio of 2 US officials discussing backing Russian opposition. Take watch, and read: thedailybeast.com/victoria-nul

A few notes: The fake stories were ranked high in Google search before I reached out to Google about the disinformation, raising alarming questions about the future of content moderation and search algorithms when it comes to Russian disinformation leading into the 2024 election

Show thread

This specific op is not an isolated incident. There are several fake news sites peddling pro-Russia narratives trying to undermine Western support for Ukraine. This new instance shows the overarching goal is to prop up Putin (in this case by undermining Russian opposition)

Show thread

My reporting on this got YouTube/Google to nix the fake leaked audio. But there is more work to be done. Having action taken only when a reporter gets in touch *seems* to be a whack-a-mole approach that leaves gaps in our info ecosystem.

Show thread

The big picture: This shows us a shift in Russia's disinformation playbook. We used to have trolls. Now it's news orgs meant to look real, content created using generative AI, focused on planting seeds of ideas that people will latch onto—even if it's sloppily executed disinfo.

Show thread
Follow

@shanvav
yea, NYT is meant to look real but in reality is russian shill pushing their propaganda.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml