Show more
mcneely boosted

We have to deromanticize community. It's not some pristine untouched forest of soft moss and good vibes. The corporations count on that misconception to stripmine us for content.

Community has always been as weird and messy as humans are. It's work. It's relationships. It's hard. There isn't a magic number. They aren't inherently anticommercial. They don't all look or act the same.

That's one of the reasons I wrote this and am driven to write more: powazek.com/posts/3571

@fraying Really glad to see more embracing the "Fediverse is a bar" idea. I've seen a few people articulate this before but I think this is perhaps the most fully fleshed out piece I've read. I also really appreciate that you mentioned the money part of the analogy.

mcneely boosted

i’m starting to have a lot of doubts about the continued viability of a globally open fediverse.

between having to squash bigot-run instances on a daily basis, determining if new instances are run by known threat actors, and being defederated by so called “allies” because our candid conversations rubbed their white tendencies the wrong way, i just don’t see how safe participation in the fediverse for marginalized communities is sustainable.

and that’s sad. it’s sad because whiteness has ruined yet another idea with great potential.

@kyle I know that there's several forks on GitLab for different services with Librem One (I've seen the mobile app forked from Tusky)

Which one is the right place to look/track?

mcneely boosted

Hello!, friends! There are lots of great resources out there about using this site, but here are 4 things about 🐘 that have made the difference for me, with details on each in my replies:
1. Finding the right server (Terms of Service crucial!) for you.
2. Following people as you would elsewhere – being curious and intentional about what you want to read in your feed.
3. Using the different feeds.
4. Patience!

Hey @kyle just wanted to ask about the future of the Librem Social instance. I've been here for a few years now but it doesn't seem that the platform has been updated in a long time. I've noticed that you are an avid user so I'm not worried about everything disappearing one night just hoping to know if there's ever going to be an update to v4 of Mastodon. In addition to the new features I know that there's been several security updates in releases that it seems we're missing here. Any plans?

mcneely boosted

fedi, for all its problems, has proven the value of the structural advantages of a decentralized system built on public standards and open source software. it is immune to capture and sabotage and monetization alike, in ways that corporate services can never achieve. we design distributed systems like this not only because it befits our values of autonomy and free association, but because it works, it scales — it fucking wins

Show thread
mcneely boosted

We're hiring a Staff Frontend Engineer for Glitch — an extraordinary role, because we intend to keep innovating wildly on the frontend experience of Glitch, and because the team is deeply caring & thoughtful. The role is U.S. remote, salary is $169,000 to $245,000, I've found Fastly's benefits to be exceptional, well-managed & inclusive, and we have a warm, collaborative ethos within both the team and community. Consider joining us if you want to make something wonderful!
fastly.com/about/jobs/apply/?g

@heidilifeldman @krisnelson @drustevenson while independent voters are the largest block, most of them all lean one way or the other. Very few are "truly" independent few people are actually independents (usually somewhere around 9% according to some polls).

Let's put it this way. There were enough Democrats and Dem leaning votes to elect Mark Kelly in November who ran to the left of Sinema.

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019

mcneely boosted

Then along came Elinor "Lin" Ostrom and her 1990 work "Governing the Commons." In it, Ostrom presented game theory approach to commonly owned resources, explaining how people as self-interested rational actors could avoid the logical trap of over exploitation. And then she did Hardin one better: she detailed the workings of actual extant commons which, according to Hardin and every neoliberal since, should not exist.

Ostrom illustrated what anthropologists and people in stateless societies have known for generations: people are perfectly capable of working out rules to sustainably manage shared resources. In her book, Ostrom detailed one common pasture in Switzerland that has been in continuous use since the 1500s. She also described shared fishing rights in Turkey, shared agricultural and forest land in Japan, and shared irrigation systems in Spain. There is no tragedy.

6/

Show thread

@HeavenlyPossum Its worth noting that Elinor Ostrom won a Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2009 for her work on the subject.

nobelprize.org/prizes/economic

Is there any specific reason why you didn't include the screenshots for posterity in the event that the posts are deleted?

I originally assumed it's b/c you don't want to show the content which got them de-federated, but the text content is there.

@annaecook it's a bit disturbing how often I hear that sentiment from people who choose to go back to school. It's definitely not just you

hey Fediverse, question: do you use any software to keep track of your wins and losses at work? If so what do you use. Work is moving off of the tool we currently use (15Five, its fine overall) so I need to find something new. I had previously just kept a journal of MD files organized by week but I found that hard to keep writing in. When you don't end your day at defined times I find its difficult to journal consistently.

mcneely boosted

#BlackMastodon When I started off in engineering, I told a senior colleague that I wanted to have a career a generalist instead of specializing in one area of expertise. His response was dismissive "Jack-Of-All-Trades. Master of none."

I've since come to find out that the actual full quote is:
"Jack of all trades is master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one."

With respect to all the specialists, don't let anybody shame you for being a generalist.

@aurynn I suppose that makes sense.

To become the Main Character in a decentralized network you need to be a big enough to effect a significant portion of the network. It would make sense that actual nodes or the folks in charge of them are therefore most likely to become the Main Character.

mcneely boosted

Probably unpopular?

I find myself really missing QTs here on Mastodon. Lots of folks here have really insightful things to say and I would have highlighted them with my own thoughts or echoed the sentiment about why I think it's important were this the birdsite.

I knew I really used them in a call and response manner but I'm surprised how much I notice that I miss them. It's really easy to see how they organically evolved into a real thing.

@Mundon @danirabbit I am taking solace in the fact that support for marriage equality is actually far more popular nationwide (71% according to Gallup as of 6/22) than it is according to the results of the vote (only 61%). Thanks, gerrymandering!

mcneely boosted

The #RespectForMarriageAct is good and I’m glad it passed and will be relieved when it gets signed by POTUS, but let’s not forget that 169 Republicans voted against protecting gay and interracial marriage today. There is more work to be done, more battles to fight.

Show more
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml