@newt
Such threads always amaze me — because comparing "every metric" requires at least understanding what those metrics mean, but this is pure gold — comparing software such as calculator that has been just launched and that is unlikely to allocate any more memory ever to a networked software that has already deallocated all the pages it only needed at start up, but is not unlikely to allocate more if it starts being actively used 🤦

@newt
It's heavily implied here: "no input", but do they really expect for calculator to start allocating memory by gigabytes as soon as they start e.g. adding numbers up? 😲
Not that I don't think that recent versions of Windows Calculator aren't bloated — they sure are, but direct comparison only makes sense with similar kinds of software.

Follow

@newt
I would very much mind if an RSS reader peaks at 2 gigabytes when refreshing feeds, but whether a GUI calculator requires 24 or 36 megabytes on a system that meets modern Windows requirements — who gives a shit? 🤷

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml