Cube + old FireWire 400 Companion Iomega Drive + OWC SATA enclosure chained with FW400-FW800 cable.
Only role of the the Iomega so far is to make the OWC enclosure +SSD work reliably on the Cube. It provides sufficient FireWire power I guess.
Now can boot Sorbet Leopard from FireWire SSD and Classic Mac OS 9.22 from internal IDE drive (fast enough really).
Also discovering hotline which I never used back in the days. Is it archeology or piracy ?
@santiago
> from internal IDE drive (fast enough really)
When I boot an old Mac from its internal "spinning rust" drive, I get the vibes that it has an SSD — simply because having bazillion things running in the background simply wasn't common back in the days, so starting them up didn't take forever 😂
@m0xee Same. I was running OS 9 on this (very fast) Cube yesterday and really everything responds well from the internal IDE. Different times. Booting OSX 10.5 (Sorbet) really needs an SSD not to feel sluggish.
Of course the dream stops when you need a modern browser on the modern web. It simply is much faster to launch Virtual PC and run windows (98!) apps emulated than try reading the news on a “normal” 2024 site.
@santiago
Yes, and TenFourFox was never exactly stellar in terms of performance, it feels sluggish even on my PowerMac G5 Dual.
I used to be able to make music — including recording a couple of instruments at 48 kHz applying effects in real-time on my PowerPC Mac Mini, now I doubt I would be able to even read the news using a more or less modern browser on that machine.
The Web is one of the worst offenders when it comes to making machines obsolete.
@m0xee In retrospective one of the companies that pushed intensively for more complex web apps was Google. Incidentally they are mostly a large ad company which profits from this. Then they made a mobile operating system probably with the same intent.
Not that others wouldn’t do the same. I blame capitalism as usual for the death of the good old web 🤷🏻♂️
@santiago
True, people were greeting Google with open arms in hopes that it would help strip Microsoft of their market dominance, not realizing they were falling into a new trap, probably even more cunning than the old one. In the end Google just took MS' place and some realized it all too late.
But I remain positive, we have lots of decentralized alternatives now and Gemini gives me lots of old Web vibes, having enough content to not feel like a ghost town.
@m0xee Yeah Gemini can’t do everything but I wish we could define simple conventions for example like an image gallery . Currently we can put links in a page but I’d like for the client to get a hint this can be displayed in a grid natively more appropriate for an image portfolio etc.
@santiago
That's the beauty of it — it's not "one size fits all", that is why I think it became (on its scale) so succeccful! I like mostly text content, so for me it's perfect, but I do realize that there are others who like other types of content: there are photos, there are videos, and Gemini simply won't cut it.
There are attempts to extend it, like Molerat — something like Gemini with minimal styling, but you're never sure what would stick.
Then there is "smol web"…
@m0xee Actually Gemini can be used for an image gallery. Not for huge stuff say you put 12 images and alt text only in a page , then the browser could decide to show this as a grid of images.
The part where Gemini doesn’t keep connections open would make this suboptimal though
@santiago
I agree, definitely technically possible, but lack of persistent connection and tables for representation would make it suboptimal.
Also, although Lagrange, that most use, does preload images, AFAIR they aren't supposed to be inline in gemtext, so showing thumbnails, but providing larger resolution images on request would also pose a challenge — they would have to be on their own pages, which in turn can be automatically generated, something like that 🤔
