@AndyGER
Translation and describing the image are two separate tasks. Sure, if it's a photo of nature, this AI thing might do a pretty good job, better than a lot of us would be willing to put time and effort in, but if it's some humorous image, I'm afraid, it would do a very poor job — the description it would generate will have lots of unnecessary details: it simply doesn't know what to focus on.
@duco @3kh0 @mozilla
@AndyGER
Don't get me wrong though, I'm not a fan of everything AI in the slightest, but I won't say that it's bad just because it has "AI" in it in this particular case — it should be good enough in a lot of cases, and in those when it's not, it should provide a good starting point. But I'm afraid that some people would start submitting descriptions generated by it as is — adding a line of warning text seems reasonable.
@duco @3kh0 @mozilla
@AndyGER
Speaking of translation, the result would probably be very similar to attempting to translate a joke that is built on wordplay — lacking at best. Proper translation of such a joke might not exist at all, and automated one will only cause confusion.
@duco @3kh0 @mozilla