EVERY single USB-C cable should have the USB type and bandwidth printed on the cable.
Like this one (see pic).
I'd also vote for some sort of "raised dot" standard for visually impaired folks.
https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/6/23948486/usb-c-cables-marking-speed-power-delivery-elgato
#USB #USBC
@davemark This is great! There is also room for improvement. Vital stats are power delivery and data speed, yet “3.0” tells me nothing.
USB-C cables labeled like “100W, 10GB” would be perfect.
@MacLemon @Vorsos @davemark
It was great when you could take any cable out of the drawer and if the plug and the port fit, in absolute most cases it kinda worked. Now I have to think: do I want the cable for charging or for data transfer? 🤔
I have a cable that doesn't charge battery in my phone at all — it's "charging", but the phone is just running off the charger, it will never get charged, no matter for how long you leave it plugged.
@m0xee It was even worse before USB as I‘ve iterated upon in my USB talks. :-)
For USB (Type-C) charging there are multiple parties involved. The charger, the cable, the device and the protocols to negotiate how power is transferred. Via standard USB PowerDelivery or one of the MANY proprietary charging implementations. (This is covered in my second USB talk in detail.)
It‘s not easy to single out the one culprit in that constellation. It may well be a combination that fails.
@MacLemon @Vorsos @davemark
And the cable is 100% not faulty, it works perfectly for data transfers, it even works with a different phone. So when I'm looking for a cable to charge my phone, I have to remember to not use this one. What good is having a unified port if the rule of thumb is still to use the original charger/cable — not for optimal results, sometimes to work at all? 🤷