@gabrielesvelto
I'd counter that with the fact that torrents waste a lot of electricity on hashing things that might seem redundant — just last week I've stopped seeding Ubuntu image with ratio over 2000 and I'm not even an Ubuntu user, now my seedbox that seeds over 2Tb of other stuff sits mostly idle, but, you know, in the days of crypto and huge server farms burning electricity just on training neural networks that seems really insignificant 😅
@m0xee compared to the energy cost of the transfer I think that the cost of hashing the data will be minuscule
@gabrielesvelto
Yeah, sure, it comes from my personal perception back from the days when having Azureus running was a noticeable hit on performance, so using something slightly more optimized (or at least not written in Java 😉) made sense. Nowadays I barely notice transmission-daemon running, except for when someone tries to utilize whole 100 Mbps of my connection 😅
Still, if you multiply that by tens of thousands of nodes running in p2p network — and that's what you want to achieve acceptable…
@gabrielesvelto
Anyway, my original thought was that no tech is just greater good, they all come with pros an cons, by today's standards p2p file sharing overhead is acceptable, two decades ago it didn't seem so. So maybe some of the tech that we consider "excessive" today will become acceptable tomorrow 🤷