She's kinda goofy looking but I'd still marry her and save her from a life of wage slavery so she could live in my trailer and sire me a brood of autistic gamers
>I'm so tired
Welcome to the wagecage, sweaty. Time to foot the bill for your empowerment.
Welcome to the wagecage, sweaty. Time to foot the bill for your empowerment.
DIdn't the Rockefeller Foundation and others fund the women's lib movement of the 60's so that they could exact more taxes out of a dual working family and get more kids in the government indoctrination centers, aka public schools?
@charlie_root
Soon you will only have dual working families — just to make ends meet. Women will get their right (an obligation now) to work and you will have full families again — just so your children have food on the table and a place to live! And your elites can keep milking both of you and kept doing so while you were fighting over whether dying you hair blue is good or not. Everybody wins! 😂
What a wonderful time to live in!
@PraxisOfEvil @Hoss
And when your a man of principle and work two jobs so she can stay at home, she gets *bored*, starts drinking, doing drugs and cheats. 🙄
@charlie_root
Man, I can totally understand where you're coming from, but that's not what I mean. Why keep fighting them over this at all? If you start telling women how important it is to be stay-at-home moms, you're unlikely to find common ground with some of them — others are just going to "support their kin" and it will turn into a bloodbath. Just refuse to discuss their agenda and make something like taxation a central topic — this way a lot of them will see that you might have common goals, not only something to fight over, in this case indeed everyone wins and everyone will have the lifestyle they want. I'm not saying that most women are like that, but at least some of them might indeed be happy with their cats and their friends, not having a family, but even them might have something in common with you, why fight them?
The way I see it, dwindling incomes are way bigger problem in the US that guns or abortions or any of that shit and yet people keep fighting over it instead of seeing they have a lot in common. I find this rather dumb.
I'm not a US citizen, I'm only watching from the sidelines, but the way I see it, is that during Occupy protests the Left and Right have finally found common ground and as a response to that, the elites came up with dividing society again over things that are about lifestyle and that were never and probably never should be universally agreed upon. Are gun ownership and pro-life the most pressing matters at the moment? Doesn't look that way to me — they're just means to divide the society 🤷
@m0xee
Man, I can totally understand where you're coming from, but that's not what I mean. Why keep fighting them over this at all? If you start telling women how important it is to be stay-at-home moms, you're unlikely to find common ground with some of them — others are just going to "support their kin" and it will turn into a bloodbath. Just refuse to discuss their agenda and make something like taxation a central topic — this way a lot of them will see that you might have common goals, not only something to fight over, in this case indeed everyone wins and everyone will have the lifestyle they want. I'm not saying that most women are like that, but at least some of them might indeed be happy with their cats and their friends, not having a family, but even them might have something in common with you, why fight them?
The way I see it, dwindling incomes are way bigger problem in the US that guns or abortions or any of that shit and yet people keep fighting over it instead of seeing they have a lot in common. I find this rather dumb.
I'm not a US citizen, I'm only watching from the sidelines, but the way I see it, is that during Occupy protests the Left and Right have finally found common ground and as a response to that, the elites came up with dividing society again over things that are about lifestyle and that were never and probably never should be universally agreed upon. Are gun ownership and pro-life the most pressing matters at the moment? Doesn't look that way to me — they're just means to divide the society 🤷
@m0xee
Yeah, it's all shit. Dwindling incomes play a part because a lot of women desire wealth and prosperity in a man at an older age, and these days that's a fleeting pipe dream for most men. It's also proven that the vast majority of western women are seeking only the top tier 10% of men, even ugly ones, so this makes the "normal" guy just living in peace and making ends meet "undesirable" to the roastie hags. This is why when men hit their 40's and some semblance of financial independence seek women from Asia, Russia or Eastern Europe.
@charlie_root
Exactly! Conservative lifestyle becomes a bleak shadow of its former self and in this particular case feminism has nothing to do with it (well, it does have something to do with it, but it's indirect at best), US women aren't the ones who made it so you simply can't afford the life your father could. It might still look attractive to women from other countries as US still has better living standards they'd be happy to get such an improvement, but for US women — you can't offer them much anymore, not because of some preconditioning, it's indeed not their dream come true. And neither side tries to solve that, they are both about some make-believe: just do more for less and be happy about it.
Then this inheritance thing, I know it's a topic of hot political debates in the US, and I really don't understand why some common ground can't be found. Some will inherit a couple of dozen of estates, but most children will inherit what, a house with walls made out of cardboard? Do they really have a lot in common? Some progressive scale could solve this once and for all — yes, it is a leftie thing, but it's not even close to queer communism or something like that, I think it should be well understandable to conservative men and supported by them and yet it doesn't seem to be the case because it's made so that the dividing line is once again somewhere in the lifestyle department, not about money like it should be.
@m0xee
Exactly! Conservative lifestyle becomes a bleak shadow of its former self and in this particular case feminism has nothing to do with it (well, it does have something to do with it, but it's indirect at best), US women aren't the ones who made it so you simply can't afford the life your father could. It might still look attractive to women from other countries as US still has better living standards they'd be happy to get such an improvement, but for US women — you can't offer them much anymore, not because of some preconditioning, it's indeed not their dream come true. And neither side tries to solve that, they are both about some make-believe: just do more for less and be happy about it.
Then this inheritance thing, I know it's a topic of hot political debates in the US, and I really don't understand why some common ground can't be found. Some will inherit a couple of dozen of estates, but most children will inherit what, a house with walls made out of cardboard? Do they really have a lot in common? Some progressive scale could solve this once and for all — yes, it is a leftie thing, but it's not even close to queer communism or something like that, I think it should be well understandable to conservative men and supported by them and yet it doesn't seem to be the case because it's made so that the dividing line is once again somewhere in the lifestyle department, not about money like it should be.
@m0xee
Marriage rates are plummeting in America, China, India and the EU. Men are not stupid, we're not signing contracts where the women are literally rewarded for breaking them and then can get a legal noose over us with alimony and child support. The best I've seen lately is Florida might make permanent alimony a thing of the past and it has a time limit.
A bunch of old ladies are freaking out in Florida over this and I hope they lose their homes and starve, or get beaten by dark people in nursing homes.