Old Fucking Punk @lwriemen@librem.one

Stop trying to upgrade disabled people's body when the problem is your design!
@WeirdWriter argues that the tech industry needs to stop trying to sell useless expensive gadgets no disabled person wants, or can afford, and start fixing actual accessibility barriers, like bad code, and poorly designed infrastructures.
https://sightlessscribbles.com/posts/disability-dongle/

#Accessibility #DisabilityDongle #FixYourHTML

huh, somehow I missed this while I was distracted with netbsd (thank you @techokami)

https://awful.systems/post/10050264/12946932

> Thanks for linking my toot, here’s another update since then: the same person that found the race condition also found that there was a performance regression on non-synthetic benchmarks. It went super fast on his little test but is complete dogshit when used in the real world! https://lwn.net/ml/all/atI0edrmeiRuRtNQ@thinkstation/

the remarkable kernel patch that remarkably convinced linus torvalds to go all-in on LLMs, remarkably running into all of the reasons why this was a horrible fucking idea

anyone with an ounce of familiarity with how LLMs function could’ve seen this coming, but not kernel boy. why wouldn’t you slop up a feature and all of its tests and its documentation and then just go on vacation so someone else can try to clean up your mess?

How the world changed for me with GenAI code generation: from bad to mediocre code piling up slowly, to bad to, at best, mediocre code piling up 10x faster while the team's mental model of how the system they build and own works dissolves.

“Pangram is not an oracle • Buttondown”

https://buttondown.com/maiht3k/archive/pangram-is-not-an-oracle/

> But as always, we have to be wary of any proposed technical solutions and evaluate them with care (including asking whether a technical solution is called for at all). This is again one of those cases where machine learning can easily create something that looks like a solution, but isn't, because it's easy to make a machine that gives “scores” for how likely some text is to be synthetic/authentic.

An exclusive design by HappyToast in tribute to another of the greatest comic creations of all time, The Young Ones, and their classic appearance on University Challenge. Get yours with FREE UK delivery here >>> https://go.newsthump.com/7xYrrT

“The Many Ways Trump Is Kneecapping White-Collar Crime Enforcement – Mother Jones”

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/10/white-collar-crime-enforcement-trump-white-house-sec-doj-cftc/

> Longer term, though, drops in corporate crime enforcement and regulation have often preceded some of the country’s biggest financial crises

The additional context here is that the most serious crimes and fraud in a financial bubble come AFTER the first domino has fallen. Bubbles are full of smaller frauds that everybody excuses because there's always more money later. But when a bubble starts to weaken and the bill comes due, the pressure to ramp up the fraud to perpetuate the bubble becomes impossible to resist

So, the most serious crimes related to the “AI” bubble are likely to take place over the next 12-18 months (at least)

Young People Hate AI CEOs So Passionately That It’s Almost Hard to Believe https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/young-people-ai-ceos-executives-poll

I am so glad kids aren’t stupid to buy this AI hype. They understand that future is not bright where 3 or 4 CEOs horde all wealth. Yeah so it is not hard to believe people hate these CEOs. It’s hard to believe anyone actually likes them.

RE: https://mastodon.social/@Zygos/117461869086312391

It strikes me that there’s a real Catch-22 here for AI vendors:

They want to argue that training an LLM on other people’s copyrighted work without permission is OK because the LLM and its output are transformative use.

But if it’s transformative, then the people doing the transforming must be responsible for what they created. No more “we’re just indexing other people’s work!” If it’s misleading or defamatory, that’s their responsibility now.

Can’t have it both ways.

I'm leaving WordPress platform very, very soon.

Mullenweg must give clear, transparent answers on what he wants, because we are thousand of people with disability, left behind.
An Open Letter to Matt Mullenweg on Accessibility in WordPress – Blind Access Journal https://blindaccessjournal.com/2026/10/an-open-letter-to-matt-mullenweg-on-accessibility-in-wordpress/

#wordpress #accessibility #a11y #blind

One of the patterns I’ve seen with people using Claude for programming is:

A programmer in the past looked at a tradeoff space and decided to make a common operation fast and an uncommon operation slow.

Claude lacks proper context of the use of the software but spots a pattern that looks like things it’s training set has flagged as slow and so points to the slow path as a bottleneck.

The user asks for a test case and Claude provides a simple microbenchmark that triggers the slow path.

Now that it’s confirmed as slow, the user asks a ‘agentic’ harness to explore the design space and optimise for the benchmark. The swarm of Claude instances makes plausible changes to the code and reports back with a modified version that passes the test suite and improves the microbenchmark.

The test suite doesn’t exhaustively cover all possible race conditions and so the new version may include subtle concurrency bugs. It also probably makes the common case slower and so is a regression overall.

I don’t know if other LLMs encourage this flow, but I’ve seen it several times from people using Claude.

I suspect Linus’ recent embarrassing interaction with his kernel’s virtual memory code may have been an example of this pattern. It’s very easy to do with an LLM because each step appears to be a demonstrable improvement. It comes with an objective benchmark, it passes all of the tests. Unfortunately, software often depends on a load of extrinsic knowledge that the LLM is trying to infer from a load of likely misleading data points.

(It's the delta that worries me in the code I see—the change in quality, that is. Engineers with a quarter century of experience churning out code by the bucketful that's quite a bit worse than what they used to write. So either they aren't reviewing their own code like they used to or their skills have degraded.)

bonus: since R = U/I, this means that I (current) is always equal to 2 amperes.

this textbook might kill someone

Every time I see a vibe coder say something along the lines of "if you haven't used these tools over the past five minutes, you don't know what they're capable of, because everything's different now!" I get a little bit perplexed.

You do know that we can see the output without using it ourself, right? Some of us are still reviewing pull requests and reading through code repositories, y’know?

Wednesday October 21, 2026, Joe’s Garage , Amsterdam

“Proxycafe – Rise Against Big Tech.

Door opens at 19:00. Presentation, discussion from 20:00

We are living inside a sci-fi book. Which narrative of resistance are we going to write?

In this talk we want to open a discussion, talk about the resistance to big tech.

Which kind of alternatives are we working on?”

https://joesgarage.nl/archives/19168

“Internet of/with Squirrels” :)

https://wiki.techinc.nl/Hackers_tribes#Consider_the_Squirrels.21

Oh we are talking about LLMs being conscious and whether they should get rights or not? Fuck everyone who even entertains that thought even remotely. Animal and people rights are all over the place ignored, mistreated and worse. And don’t come at me wrt whataboutism.

AI-Psychosis is too friendly at this stage.

Asking for no reason: is it an #autistic trait to be super heat sensitive/prone to worsening anxiety when hot? And as a result, to really prefer not to wear clothes while at home or otherwise in private? And also just to find most clothes restricting and uncomfortable in general? I also have some very strong preferences when it comes to fabrics, not just for clothes but for bedding, towels, and cloths as well.

This is all a bit embarassing, but I'm dying to know if I'm alone in this.

#askfedi

"I suggest the social action: shame. Shame these people. Their actions are shameful. AI bros hate being shamed and they try to make rules against shaming — because shame works.

None of these people doing shameful things deserve a place in polite company. They should be shamed for their shameful choices."

Linux kernel goes full AI slop code, hides chatbot commits – Pivot to AI
https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/10/14/linux-kernel-goes-full-ai-slop-code-hides-chatbot-commits/

@j5v Yeah, the emerging monoculture where everybody copies tech's abusive mismanagement habits and falling into the same investment-motivated traps is one of the biggest issues we're facing. It's happening here in Iceland as well. Our unions have become more militant in response, but in many cases that has alienated them from the popular political support they used to have, which would have been the key to fixing it.

(Every left-wing party got wiped out from parliament last election here.)

True reform is for most of these tech companies to no longer exist in their current form and for them to get replaced by something healthier and more constructive. That requires political, regulatory, and economic reform.

5/5