Show more

The Trump regime's all-out war on fair elections -- spanning myriad tactic and agencies, often blatantly illegally -- should be a front-and-center preoccupation of every American journalism organization. At best we're getting episodic coverage. ProPublica gets it. propublica.org/article/trump-m

As we have gotten a number of inquiries due to confusions about this: Following our annual member assembly, we have indeed sent out emails for voting on its proposals. But only to those who have an active e. V. membership. If you are a ‘supporting’ member of Codeberg e. V., you do not have active voting rights.

Playing a benefit show for the Prairieland defendants. Don't ask me where it is, I have no clue.

Finally read about cyclospora, and I'll be modifying all my salads to contain only the Bacon Bits for my own health and safety.

Billionaire-owned media only serves billionaires, while we answer to readers and movements. The investigative reporting and on-the-ground journalism you rely on exists because people like you choose to support it.

Support the Future of Journalism: bit.ly/4bb6fdW

"Hi, we are Green Halcones, a social cooperative owned by formerly incarcerated individuals based in Los Angeles, California. We are working to make neighborhoods beautiful, grow healthy food, and protect the environment for future generations."

geo.coop/articles/introducing-

@_elena

>Wondering if the fediverse - and Mastodon in particular - is undergoing a major spam / bot signup wave at the moment

Yes, broadly and consistently.

> I wonder if #agenticAI has anything to do with the uptick in suspicious, bot-like accounts

Yes, broadly and consistently.

It is overwhelming some servers and some moderators, and many more are just tired of dealing with it.

IFTAS needs to hear from admins and moderators in the annual survey:

tally.so/r/81MW6k

Cell-site simulators (CSS, also known as Stingrays or IMSI catchers) are devices that masquerade as legitimate cell-phone towers, tricking phones within a certain radius into connecting to the device rather than a tower. Our tool, Rayhunter, can help you find them. eff.org/deeplinks/2025/03/meet

“They are not prepared to change their society to come to terms with reality. And so they go down with the ship.”

Dr. Richard D. Wolff on Europe’s economic decline, rising militarism and the war in Ukraine.

inthesetimes.com/article/europ

Really, being non-neurotypical is a blessing. Also a curse, but it all evens out by old white men's brains exploding over us not giving a fuck about hierarchy 😬

Hey, I'm going to give this a try. #Fedihire

I have written tons of blogs, whitepapers, books, and ad copy for tech companies about cybersecurity and general enterprise IT. See my portfolio: kimcrawley.com

I used to make a comfortably liveable income. But since the Gen AI menace, my livelihood has been destroyed and I can't pay my rent. I'm now writing Kickstarter funded self published books to survive.

I could really use proper writing gigs, though.

Some of the bestselling cybersecurity books, such as The Pentester Blueprint, were partly or completely written by me.

Please email kim.crawley at stopgenai dot com, or message me on Signal via crowgirl.84

Because this zombie question refuses to die (and in fact someone asked me about developing an on-chain Lifehouse federation just the other day): as of mid-2026, so far as I am able to determine, there remain *zero* implementations of a DAO that (a) achieve ends that might generally be recognized as progressive, (b) which could not be achieved by other, entirely conventional means.

As is so often the case, the problems technically-inclined people are motivated to address are those which are congenial to their skills and predilections, not the ones which are salient. If you want to organize, I’m sorry: it still involves having to deal with other people, and will for the foreseeable future.

anyway even if 100% of computer programmers *were* using AI, that wouldn't mean that AI is good or effective or worthwhile. could just mean that 100% of computer programmers are reckless shitheads

RE: mastodon.social/@glyph/1168859

For me, there are four major reasons to oppose AI (with my note the other day about both disaggregating and aggregating in mind):

1. AI products are founded on eugenicist philosophy and primarily benefit fascists.
2. AI products are created by exploiting labor and are designed to continue undermining labor rights.
3. AI products carry unconscionable environmental costs.
4. AI products introduce unconscionable risk of new defects.

Only one of those is even indirectly about quality.

Show more
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml