@lwriemen I'm very aware privilege (my own and others), and lack thereof. Totally agree about 'where you start'. That said, I think it's pretty easy to see the difference between jobs taken out of need vs. jobs taken by choice. I'd say few people take a departmental manager or VP role at Microsoft out of desperation. Working in the canteen or acting as a janitor, yeah, maybe. I see culpability as proportional to decision-making power/influence.
@lightweight Sometimes not that much. Depends upon where you started.
The job market is something you have to balance with family commitments. Location makes choices for you, and you can't always change those. Saying you can is the equivalent of saying, "pull yourself up by your bootstraps".
Now out, a piece co-written with @Dahlialith, and given a terrific headline by Jeremy Stahl: “Let’s Stop Pretending Clarence Thomas Can Read the Framers’ Minds."
We explain that *nothing* about historical analogy requires the Supreme Court to allow domestic abusers, among others, to have guns.
#GunViolence #2A #Guns #Bruen #Heller #Rahimi #DomesticViolence #LawFedi
This Guardian investigation is shocking, or should be. Massive online manipulation of elections by Israeli company. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/15/revealed-disinformation-team-jorge-claim-meddling-elections-tal-hanan?CMP=share_btn_tw
@alcinnz @msw @lightweight @downey @skyfaller I take #TechRights with a grain of salt, but they often include a lot of investigative data. You just have to sort fact from opinion.
Delivery Exception | The Nib
https://thenib.com/mail-fail/
Derailed | The Nib
https://thenib.com/derailed/
@waldoj I highly doubt "scrum-team year" is a standardized metric. If you haven't yet, you should read one of Capers Jones' books on software estimation.
As long as people keep recommending non-standard metrics, the software world will continue to be faith-based rather than scientific in choosing methods, processes, languages, developers, etc.
Why are government software systems so expensive?
Well, the agency publishes an RFI, and vendors respond saying how much they think the system should cost. Agencies take those responses, average them, and tell their legislature or a federal grant-maker “it’s gonna cost $50M.” So $50M is given to the agency—as a matter of public record—and the agency issues an RFP. The quotes are all going to be for real close to…$50M. And where did that price tag come from? The very vendors who are bidding.
😳
@waldoj What kind of metrics would you recommend?
If it were me, I'd want a function point analysis done before asking for quotes or ask the vendors to supply one. The number of function points could then be compared against known data (e.g., from the IFPUG) to get an idea of the cost of such a product.
Google employees, many of them high profile, are showing up on the Fediverse.
@methode is a case in point.
His Mastodon bio describes him as "Chief of Sunshine and Happiness at Google".
Translation: webmaster trends analyst.
SEO folks are paying close attention.
I *know* that the Fediverse is on Google's corporate radar.
Yes, geckos and skinks (the other family of NZ-native lizards) sacrifice their tails when attacked, but they don't grow back the same (no bones & not the same nerves for starters, so they're far less useful), and it takes a huge toll on their future fitness, so it's pretty messed up when it happens.
A remarkably small number of them are responsible for the majority of damage done to our planet in terms of 'externalities' like pollution, social division and inequity, wanton destruction of biodiversity, and the existential threats to the biosphere due to climate change, a canonical example of which Aotearoa is weathering as I write.. Their existence is incompatible with humanity's chance for a prosperous future (i.e. a future *without* growth).
3/3
@lightweight The one case where dependence on one is valid is when it is the moral high ground. e.g., one might take a loan from a known loan shark, if their kids are starving.
Morality is relative.
Funny this came up after I just saw the movie, Knock at the Cabin. (Not a must see, and I don't know why they didn't keep the book title.)
Periodic reminder: public listed corporations are not our friend. They have a single directive: maximise returns for shareholders, and are legally bound to do anything they can get away with to achieve that. They exist to concentrate the means of the many in the hands of the few They are fundamentally 'engines of inequity'. Because of their single incentive, they are in a race to the ethical bottom. Their structure is that of an autocracy. A few of them are... 1/3
@lightweight @ByronCinNZ @alcinnz @downey @skyfaller FWIW, I don't feel that questioning my motives given my affiliation is an ad hominem attack.
If someone said I was morally corrupt for working at a company like Amazon (I don't think that was said), I might feel a bit different...
@msw @lightweight @alcinnz @downey @skyfaller My experience in large corporations is that while you can advocate within you can only change by adding value to their bottom line, and adding value to the bottom line can often lead to unintended corruption. I've always kept my name separate from the corporation I work for in all #FOSS contributions.
#ShlaerMellor, #FunctionPointAnalysis, #punk, #environmentalist, #unionAdvocate, #anarchosocialist
"with a big old lie and a flag and a pie and a mom and a bible most folks are just liable to buy any line, any place, any time" - Frank Zappa