Show more

"We moved to GitHub because everyone's already there"

"We shut down the mailing lists because most of our users prefer to use GitLab in their web browser"

"We're rewriting in Rust because we don't really have any non-x86_64 users"

"We're leaving IRC because Discord is more user-friendly"

What all of these arguments have in common is that they exclude people, centralize infrastructure, and eschew free software for proprietary solutions, all in the name of some ill-defined measure of "progress".

Tor is a volunteer-run service that provides both privacy and anonymity online by masking who you are and where you are connecting. Review our guide on using Tor for Linux to get set up. ssd.eff.org/en/module/how-use-

@fribbledom I don't think the USA has ever been a high trust society in my lifetime. Maybe the lack of trust is just finally hitting the average, white upper middle and richer classes?

The fact that a lot of people use a particular software application does not, for a second, suggest that it's the best of its kind... nor even any good at all.

The market is largely ignorant, and therefore very vulnerable to marketing. Also, most pundits have a strong incentive to find the products of the richest software author the best (because they tend to spend the most on marketing with "independent" IT journalism titles). All this leads to incredible mediocrity in the software world.

Just got done with Kevin Mattson's new book, We're Not Here to Entertain. He's the kind of person I wouldn't have gotten along with back in the '80s punk scene. Sure that punk fit in this small defined package. It's a decent book for catching the horrific feeling of the Reagan presidency; helped confirm my opinion of Trump as Reagan II.

Trouble is he tries to define punk as only existing between 80-85, white male, suburban, and straight edge. There are many omissions to support his view.

Alex Pentland, one of the world's most cited computer scientists has a radical yet easy-to-implement vision on how data cooperatives could be the future of how the most valuable asset in the modern economy is owned.

My new article.

coop.exchange/blog/e1803df3-0e

@fribbledom Unit tests are a must, but test driven development is an error prone method of analysis. It's popular with "coders" (those who feel that code is their most important output), because it represents continuous coding. Management likes it, because they get to remove some of what they consider overhead in their processes. (i.e., it helps move coding closer to a manufacturing process than a knowledge process.)
The real problem is the loss of independent test.

That thing where you're told to work harder when you thought you were getting paid to work smarter.

Show more
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml