Show more

First: This isn't just a ban from using App Stores, but from using US networks entirely—and it's untenable. Code is itself speech. Banning Americans from using TikTok and WeChat would violate their own First Amendment rights.

eff.org/deeplinks/2020/08/tikt

@eff I try to only have productive conversations on social media, but that only seems to occur amongst like minded people. This isn't a new phenomenon. For all the talk of increasing polarization, the same was true back in the days of Usenet. Anonymity makes it easy to be a jerk, but when you talk within a community, your username becomes your source of regard.

Trump, fascism 

Last year, millions of people fought back the European Union’s #Article17. The fight isn’t over - we're pushing the EU member states to limit the use of automated filtering and protect users right's as they implement the law nationally. eff.org/deeplinks/2020/09/eff-

@LeoSammallahti chomsky.info/20170202

Search for "Take pandemics"

Warnings of the next outbreak were present after the "bird-flu" outbreak, and the government did take action.
politico.com/news/2020/03/25/t

@LeoSammallahti The bottom line is that Gates needs a profit motive to take action. He isn't a philanthropist, like the media claims, just a disaster capitalist. His pandemic warnings were driven by a desire to increase his wealth, otherwise he would've undertaken the funding he was asking for.

Maybe the reason no other "leaders" spoke out was they couldn't come up with a way to profit from it.

@LeoSammallahti At Gates wealth level, he can make governments listen. (At least in the USA, our politicians are buyable and not that expensive. Gates knows that from the Microsoft antitrust trial.) He could start manufacturing of PPE and respirators. He could fund more research into the viruses.

@LeoSammallahti On Gates...if he knew, given his financial resources, why didn't he take action?

We're at war with our government now.

Bill Barr reportedly suggested bringing sedition charges against protesters
theguardian.com/us-news/2020/s

The EPA Responded to a Respiratory Virus by Relaxing Pollution Controls - Major polluters were deemed 'essential.' Under EPA policy, environmental and safety inspectors were not. inthesetimes.com/article/epa-p

Show more
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml